Crafting Policies Together: Citizen Preferences After Crisis

Abstract Do citizens prefer national policies that are designed collaboratively over those produced by national government alone? The question is relevant, especially in Latin America, where citizens are sceptical of government’s capacity to address complex problems. In this article, we hypothesize that collaboratively crafted policies will be preferred over those produced by government alone in Argentina and Chile. We design conjoint experiments that ask respondents to choose among three pairs of policies, each of which varies randomly in terms of whether and with whom the government collaborates. We find that citizens in both countries tend to prefer collaboratively produced policies. This is especially the case when citizens have higher levels of trust in the actors with whom the national government collaborates. One important insight of our study is that, despite the costs of collaborative approaches to policymaking, citizen preferences for it could incentivize national governments to invest more resources in collaborative governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Government and Opposition
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2025.10014
Primary Topic
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crafting Policies Together: Citizen Preferences After Crisis

Matías Bianchi, Paula Clerici, Jennifer Cyr, Julieta Suárez-Cao
Government and Opposition
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
article

Crafting Policies Together: Citizen Preferences After Crisis

Matías Bianchi, Paula Clerici, Jennifer Cyr, Julieta Suárez-Cao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Do citizens prefer national policies that are designed collaboratively over those produced by national government alone? The question is relevant, especially in Latin America, where citizens are sceptical of government’s capacity to address complex problems. In this article, we hypothesize that collaboratively crafted policies will be preferred over those produced by government alone in Argentina and Chile. We design conjoint experiments that ask respondents to choose among three pairs of policies, each of which varies randomly in terms of whether and with whom the government collaborates. We find that citizens in both countries tend to prefer collaboratively produced policies. This is especially the case when citizens have higher levels of trust in the actors with whom the national government collaborates. One important insight of our study is that, despite the costs of collaborative approaches to policymaking, citizen preferences for it could incentivize national governments to invest more resources in collaborative governance.

Government and OppositionVol. 60(4)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Universidad Torcuato Di Tella (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Crafting Policies Together: Citizen Preferences After Crisis — Matías Bianchi, Paula Clerici, et al. · Government and Opposition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS