Barriers to the Growth and Implementation of Biogas Technology: The Kenyan Experience

ABSTRACT Households in sub‐Saharan Africa predominantly rely on biomass energy for cooking, which has negative impacts on health and the environment. Biogas technology presents a promising alternative for developing nations like Kenya, yet its adoption faces multiple barriers at both individual and systemic levels. The study aims to investigate the obstacles to biogas development and adoption in Kenya. Thirty‐two (32) biogas experts from the renewable energy, biogas, and government & policy sectors were randomly selected for the study. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), to prioritize the main barriers, with reliability ensured through a consistency ratio (CR < 0.1). Findings revealed high participant understanding and involvement, with economic factors being identified as the most significant barrier (weight = 0.4163). Other challenges included technical (0.3541), societal (0.0859), infrastructural (0.0734), and policy‐related issues (0.07040). Lack of awareness about biogas benefits emerged as the top sub‐criterion (0.4960), followed by poor distribution infrastructure (0.4286) and technician availability (0.4278). In conclusion, the study found that enhancing technical support, improving infrastructure, and raising awareness about the benefits of biogas are crucial for its wider adoption. The study recommends public awareness and educational training programs to improve overall understanding, capacity‐building initiatives to improve technical expertise, and further studies focusing on the exploration of affordable technologies, such as cost reduction methods, scalable production techniques, or localized innovations for rural areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Science & Engineering
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70237
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to the Growth and Implementation of Biogas Technology: The Kenyan Experience

Muyiwa S. Adaramola, Stephen K. Kimutai, Purity M. Mutahi
1 citations
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy and Environment Impacts
0.50
article

Barriers to the Growth and Implementation of Biogas Technology: The Kenyan Experience

Muyiwa S. Adaramola, Stephen K. Kimutai, Purity M. Mutahi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Households in sub‐Saharan Africa predominantly rely on biomass energy for cooking, which has negative impacts on health and the environment. Biogas technology presents a promising alternative for developing nations like Kenya, yet its adoption faces multiple barriers at both individual and systemic levels. The study aims to investigate the obstacles to biogas development and adoption in Kenya. Thirty‐two (32) biogas experts from the renewable energy, biogas, and government & policy sectors were randomly selected for the study. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), to prioritize the main barriers, with reliability ensured through a consistency ratio (CR < 0.1). Findings revealed high participant understanding and involvement, with economic factors being identified as the most significant barrier (weight = 0.4163). Other challenges included technical (0.3541), societal (0.0859), infrastructural (0.0734), and policy‐related issues (0.07040). Lack of awareness about biogas benefits emerged as the top sub‐criterion (0.4960), followed by poor distribution infrastructure (0.4286) and technician availability (0.4278). In conclusion, the study found that enhancing technical support, improving infrastructure, and raising awareness about the benefits of biogas are crucial for its wider adoption. The study recommends public awareness and educational training programs to improve overall understanding, capacity‐building initiatives to improve technical expertise, and further studies focusing on the exploration of affordable technologies, such as cost reduction methods, scalable production techniques, or localized innovations for rural areas.

Energy Science & EngineeringVol. 13(11)
Moi University (KE), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Norges Miljø- og Biovitenskapelige Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Energy and Environment Impacts
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.