Mismatch in Preferences for Working from Home: Evidence from Discrete Choice Experiments with Workers and Employers

The authors study workers’ and employers’ preferences for remote work, distinguishing between hybrid and fully remote arrangements. Using discrete choice experiments with more than 10,000 workers and 1,500 employers in Poland, they find a shared preference for hybrid over fully remote work. However, workers’ estimated benefits from remote work fall significantly short of employers’ estimated costs, with average gaps equivalent to 5.2% of earnings for hybrid work and 24.6% for fully remote work. Only 25–35% of employers—those with positive views on remote work productivity and high-quality talent management—value remote work costs in line with workers’ valuations of benefits, particularly in non-routine cognitive occupations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939251355928
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mismatch in Preferences for Working from Home: Evidence from Discrete Choice Experiments with Workers and Employers

Katarzyna Lipowska, Mateusz Smoter, Piotr Lewandowski
2 citations
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
6.26
article

Mismatch in Preferences for Working from Home: Evidence from Discrete Choice Experiments with Workers and Employers

Katarzyna Lipowska, Mateusz Smoter, Piotr Lewandowski
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The authors study workers’ and employers’ preferences for remote work, distinguishing between hybrid and fully remote arrangements. Using discrete choice experiments with more than 10,000 workers and 1,500 employers in Poland, they find a shared preference for hybrid over fully remote work. However, workers’ estimated benefits from remote work fall significantly short of employers’ estimated costs, with average gaps equivalent to 5.2% of earnings for hybrid work and 24.6% for fully remote work. Only 25–35% of employers—those with positive views on remote work productivity and high-quality talent management—value remote work costs in line with workers’ valuations of benefits, particularly in non-routine cognitive occupations.

Industrial and Labor Relations ReviewVol. 79(1)
Institute for Structural Research (PL)
European Social Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mismatch in Preferences for Working from Home: Evidence from Discrete Choice Experiments with Workers and Employers — Katarzyna Lipowska, Mateusz Smoter, et al. · Industrial and Labor Relations Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS