Will the “True” Productivity Series Please Stand Up? Identifying Inconsistencies Across Productivity Series

ABSTRACT We conduct a systematic empirical investigation into the consistency of competing industry‐level total factor productivity (TFP) series in the United States, including the crop and animal production or farm sector. We apply an algorithm based on time‐series methods to three widely‐used databases frequently utilized by researchers to study productivity. Our analysis reveals a substantial proportion of inconsistent industry‐level TFP series across these databases, including those for the farm sector. We further investigate the potential causes of such discrepancies by examining the consistency of the individual output and input variables used in the calculation of the TFP series. Individual input and output series pairs show different patterns of inconsistency across databases. Our findings highlight the need for publishing agencies and researchers to explore opportunities for methodological standardization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Economics
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70056
Primary Topic
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Will the “True” Productivity Series Please Stand Up? Identifying Inconsistencies Across Productivity Series

Sergio H. Lence, Alejandro Plastina
Agricultural Economics
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
article

Will the “True” Productivity Series Please Stand Up? Identifying Inconsistencies Across Productivity Series

Sergio H. Lence, Alejandro Plastina
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We conduct a systematic empirical investigation into the consistency of competing industry‐level total factor productivity (TFP) series in the United States, including the crop and animal production or farm sector. We apply an algorithm based on time‐series methods to three widely‐used databases frequently utilized by researchers to study productivity. Our analysis reveals a substantial proportion of inconsistent industry‐level TFP series across these databases, including those for the farm sector. We further investigate the potential causes of such discrepancies by examining the consistency of the individual output and input variables used in the calculation of the TFP series. Individual input and output series pairs show different patterns of inconsistency across databases. Our findings highlight the need for publishing agencies and researchers to explore opportunities for methodological standardization.

Agricultural EconomicsVol. 56(6)
Iowa State University (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Will the “True” Productivity Series Please Stand Up? Identifying Inconsistencies Across Productivity Series — Sergio H. Lence, Alejandro Plastina · Agricultural Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS