When digital technologies stumble: Exnovating for conservation science and practice

Abstract Digital technologies are rapidly transforming conservation efforts in response to pressing planetary environmental challenges. However, these expanding innovations also introduce significant risks and failures that can deepen existing injustices. Although growing approaches to responsible innovation establish ethical standards and best practices for conservation technologies, gaps remain in addressing limited and obsolete methods. This perspective article presents the integration of exnovation strategies into conservation science and practice as a set of deliberate efforts to mitigate, diagnose, repair, remove, and substitute misaligned, ineffective, or harmful technologies. We propose exnovation interventions not only to address technological shortcomings but also to open space for responsible innovation pathways that foster negotiation, reflexivity, and context‐sensitive approaches. These insights highlight the need for collaboration, the redistribution of accountability, and participatory engagement to ensure conservation technologies are responsive to local realities and diverse capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70112
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When digital technologies stumble: Exnovating for conservation science and practice

Danilo Urzedo, Sabrina Chakori
Conservation Science and Practice
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

When digital technologies stumble: Exnovating for conservation science and practice

Danilo Urzedo, Sabrina Chakori
article en

Abstract

Abstract Digital technologies are rapidly transforming conservation efforts in response to pressing planetary environmental challenges. However, these expanding innovations also introduce significant risks and failures that can deepen existing injustices. Although growing approaches to responsible innovation establish ethical standards and best practices for conservation technologies, gaps remain in addressing limited and obsolete methods. This perspective article presents the integration of exnovation strategies into conservation science and practice as a set of deliberate efforts to mitigate, diagnose, repair, remove, and substitute misaligned, ineffective, or harmful technologies. We propose exnovation interventions not only to address technological shortcomings but also to open space for responsible innovation pathways that foster negotiation, reflexivity, and context‐sensitive approaches. These insights highlight the need for collaboration, the redistribution of accountability, and participatory engagement to ensure conservation technologies are responsive to local realities and diverse capabilities.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(9)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Queensland Department of Environment and Science (AU)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When digital technologies stumble: Exnovating for conservation science and practice — Danilo Urzedo, Sabrina Chakori · Conservation Science and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS