Fiscal Determinants of State Spending: Does a Rainy Day Fund Impact Higher Education Funding?

State higher education funding in the U.S. plays an important role in enabling a state’s residents to access postsecondary education but recessions, competing spending priorities and institutional features of a state’s political system put downward pressure on such funding. On the other hand, states that have significant state savings in the form of a rainy day fund (RDF) are less subject to spending tradeoffs, cuts in government spending or increase in taxes. Using data from Pew Charitable Trust, Urban Institute and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, this study finds that states that have more fiscal cushion in the form of RDFs spend a higher proportion of their general budget on higher education. The concern that higher RDF balances would benefit other spending areas while negatively or weakly affecting higher education funding is not confirmed. Instead, states with stronger fiscal health appear better equipped to prioritize investments in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
State and Local Government Review
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x251353223
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fiscal Determinants of State Spending: Does a Rainy Day Fund Impact Higher Education Funding?

Larry Liu
State and Local Government Review
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
article

Fiscal Determinants of State Spending: Does a Rainy Day Fund Impact Higher Education Funding?

Larry Liu
article en

Abstract

State higher education funding in the U.S. plays an important role in enabling a state’s residents to access postsecondary education but recessions, competing spending priorities and institutional features of a state’s political system put downward pressure on such funding. On the other hand, states that have significant state savings in the form of a rainy day fund (RDF) are less subject to spending tradeoffs, cuts in government spending or increase in taxes. Using data from Pew Charitable Trust, Urban Institute and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, this study finds that states that have more fiscal cushion in the form of RDFs spend a higher proportion of their general budget on higher education. The concern that higher RDF balances would benefit other spending areas while negatively or weakly affecting higher education funding is not confirmed. Instead, states with stronger fiscal health appear better equipped to prioritize investments in higher education.

State and Local Government ReviewVol. 58(1)
Morgan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fiscal Determinants of State Spending: Does a Rainy Day Fund Impact Higher Education Funding? — Larry Liu · State and Local Government Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS