Establishment of National Public Audit Oversight Boards: Descriptive Evidence and Implications for Audit Quality

ABSTRACT We investigate the establishment of public audit oversight bodies (POBs) worldwide. We present descriptive evidence on POBs’ characteristics and factors influencing the timing of their establishment, finding that countries with stronger institutions, civil law traditions, and higher media attention to audit quality adopt POBs faster. While countries may choose similar POB design features, these choices do not align with the factors driving adoption speed. We also explore whether the finding of a positive impact on audit quality of the U.S. PCAOB generalizes to other countries. A difference‐in‐differences analysis over 20 years provides some evidence that POB establishment and their characteristics improve audit quality. However, the results appear sensitive to audit quality measures and research design. Our study offers the first broad‐based investigation of POB adoption and provides important nuance on the relation between POBs and audit quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting Research
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.70008
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishment of National Public Audit Oversight Boards: Descriptive Evidence and Implications for Audit Quality

Ann Vanstraelen, Roger Simnett, Ulrike Thuerheimer, Phillip T. Lamoreaux et al.
4 citations
Journal of Accounting Research
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
15.64
article

Establishment of National Public Audit Oversight Boards: Descriptive Evidence and Implications for Audit Quality

Ann Vanstraelen, Roger Simnett, Ulrike Thuerheimer, Phillip T. Lamoreaux, Elizabeth Carson
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We investigate the establishment of public audit oversight bodies (POBs) worldwide. We present descriptive evidence on POBs’ characteristics and factors influencing the timing of their establishment, finding that countries with stronger institutions, civil law traditions, and higher media attention to audit quality adopt POBs faster. While countries may choose similar POB design features, these choices do not align with the factors driving adoption speed. We also explore whether the finding of a positive impact on audit quality of the U.S. PCAOB generalizes to other countries. A difference‐in‐differences analysis over 20 years provides some evidence that POB establishment and their characteristics improve audit quality. However, the results appear sensitive to audit quality measures and research design. Our study offers the first broad‐based investigation of POB adoption and provides important nuance on the relation between POBs and audit quality.

Journal of Accounting ResearchVol. 64(1)
University of Antwerp (BE), Deakin University (AU), Maastricht University (NL), MIT University (MK), Arizona State University (US), RMIT University (AU), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
15.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Establishment of National Public Audit Oversight Boards: Descriptive Evidence and Implications for Audit Quality — Ann Vanstraelen, Roger Simnett, et al. · Journal of Accounting Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS