Human Performance in Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Review

Deepfakes refer to a wide range of computer‐generated synthetic media, in which a person’s appearance or likeness is altered to resemble that of another. This systematic review is aimed at providing an overview of the existing research into people’s ability to detect deepfakes. Five databases (IEEE, ProQuest, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched up to December 2023. Studies were included if they (1) were an original study; (2) were reported in English; (3) examined people’s detection of deepfakes; (4) examined the influence of an intervention, strategy, or variable on deepfake detection; and (5) reported relevant data needed to evaluate detection accuracy. Forty independent studies from 30 unique records were included in the review. Results were narratively summarized, with key findings organized based on the review’s research questions. Studies used different performance measures, making it difficult to compare results across the literature. Detection accuracy varies widely, with some studies showing humans outperforming AI models and others indicating the opposite. Detection performance is also influenced by person‐level (e.g., cognitive ability, analytical thinking) and stimuli‐level factors (e.g., quality of deepfake, familiarity with the subject). Interventions to improve people’s deepfake detection yielded mixed results. Humans and AI‐based detection models focus on different aspects when detecting, suggesting a potential for human–AI collaboration. The findings highlight the complex interplay of factors influencing human deepfake detection and the need for further research to develop effective strategies for deepfake detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/hbe2/1833228
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Digital Media Forensic Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human Performance in Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Review

D.J. Miller, Klaire Somoray, Mary Anne Holmes
5 citations
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Digital Media Forensic Detection
6.38
article

Human Performance in Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Review

D.J. Miller, Klaire Somoray, Mary Anne Holmes
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Deepfakes refer to a wide range of computer‐generated synthetic media, in which a person’s appearance or likeness is altered to resemble that of another. This systematic review is aimed at providing an overview of the existing research into people’s ability to detect deepfakes. Five databases (IEEE, ProQuest, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched up to December 2023. Studies were included if they (1) were an original study; (2) were reported in English; (3) examined people’s detection of deepfakes; (4) examined the influence of an intervention, strategy, or variable on deepfake detection; and (5) reported relevant data needed to evaluate detection accuracy. Forty independent studies from 30 unique records were included in the review. Results were narratively summarized, with key findings organized based on the review’s research questions. Studies used different performance measures, making it difficult to compare results across the literature. Detection accuracy varies widely, with some studies showing humans outperforming AI models and others indicating the opposite. Detection performance is also influenced by person‐level (e.g., cognitive ability, analytical thinking) and stimuli‐level factors (e.g., quality of deepfake, familiarity with the subject). Interventions to improve people’s deepfake detection yielded mixed results. Humans and AI‐based detection models focus on different aspects when detecting, suggesting a potential for human–AI collaboration. The findings highlight the complex interplay of factors influencing human deepfake detection and the need for further research to develop effective strategies for deepfake detection.

Human Behavior and Emerging TechnologiesVol. 2025(1)
James Cook University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Media Forensic Detection
6.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.