Paired-field evaluation of a saturated buffer reveals significant water-quality benefits through upstream weir management

Past studies evaluating the conservation drainage practice of saturated buffers (SB) have used the water flowing over the upstream weir as a control, assuming that upstream weir management does not reduce flow and nitrate load. The objectives are to (1) investigate whether the upstream weir functions as controlled drainage (CD) to provide water-quality benefits beyond those from the buffer flow (BF, defined as water diverted into the buffer), and (2) evaluate the performance of the SB system under high (shallow) and low (deep) weir management levels. From June 2019 to September 2024, we conducted a paired-field study at an on-farm site in Michigan, USA, comparing an SB system to a free drainage control field. Using this method, we separated the two components of the SB system into CD and BF. Results revealed a significant reduction in nitrate-N load (54.5% and 11.1 kg/ha annually, p -value < 0.01) of the SB system compared to free drainage. The CD component emerged as the dominant contributor to nitrate-N load removal (48.0% and 9.6 kg/ha annually), confirming the crucial water-quality role of upstream weir management. Studies that ignored the water-quality effect of the CD component likely underestimated the performance of SB. The BF component contributed to only 6.4% of nitrate-N load reduction. High-level weir setting significantly removed more nitrate-N (0.076 kg/ha daily) than low-level setting (0.036 kg/ha daily). In conclusion, this study shows the significant water-quality contribution of the CD component and underscores the importance of weir management for enhancing nitrate load removal. • Paired-field approach allowed direct comparison of a saturated buffer with free drainage. • Upstream weir management played a key role in reducing nitrate loss. • Low-level weir management diminished the performance of the saturated buffer. • Saturated buffers have been performing better than previously indicated by past studies. • Controlled drainage improves water quality even without flat fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109664
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paired-field evaluation of a saturated buffer reveals significant water-quality benefits through upstream weir management

Ehsan Ghane, Ashkan Tehrani, Yousef Abdalaal
3 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
2.45
article

Paired-field evaluation of a saturated buffer reveals significant water-quality benefits through upstream weir management

Ehsan Ghane, Ashkan Tehrani, Yousef Abdalaal
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Past studies evaluating the conservation drainage practice of saturated buffers (SB) have used the water flowing over the upstream weir as a control, assuming that upstream weir management does not reduce flow and nitrate load. The objectives are to (1) investigate whether the upstream weir functions as controlled drainage (CD) to provide water-quality benefits beyond those from the buffer flow (BF, defined as water diverted into the buffer), and (2) evaluate the performance of the SB system under high (shallow) and low (deep) weir management levels. From June 2019 to September 2024, we conducted a paired-field study at an on-farm site in Michigan, USA, comparing an SB system to a free drainage control field. Using this method, we separated the two components of the SB system into CD and BF. Results revealed a significant reduction in nitrate-N load (54.5% and 11.1 kg/ha annually, p -value < 0.01) of the SB system compared to free drainage. The CD component emerged as the dominant contributor to nitrate-N load removal (48.0% and 9.6 kg/ha annually), confirming the crucial water-quality role of upstream weir management. Studies that ignored the water-quality effect of the CD component likely underestimated the performance of SB. The BF component contributed to only 6.4% of nitrate-N load reduction. High-level weir setting significantly removed more nitrate-N (0.076 kg/ha daily) than low-level setting (0.036 kg/ha daily). In conclusion, this study shows the significant water-quality contribution of the CD component and underscores the importance of weir management for enhancing nitrate load removal. • Paired-field approach allowed direct comparison of a saturated buffer with free drainage. • Upstream weir management played a key role in reducing nitrate loss. • Low-level weir management diminished the performance of the saturated buffer. • Saturated buffers have been performing better than previously indicated by past studies. • Controlled drainage improves water quality even without flat fields.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 318
North Carolina State University (US), Michigan State University (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.