A Comparative Analysis of Gender‐Just Language in First‐Year German Textbooks

ABSTRACT This study analyzes the inclusion of binary and non‐binary gender‐just language in US first‐year college German textbooks. The analysis covers eight textbooks, evaluating their use of gender‐just forms such as the gender star and neopronouns, which explicitly represent non‐binary positionalities, as well as “neutral” or binary gender‐inclusive forms such as neutralization and the co‐naming of masculine and feminine forms. Findings indicate significant variation in inclusivity, with most textbooks integrating binary inclusivity, some textbooks integrating non‐binary inclusive language to some extent and only one predominantly using the generic masculine. Results suggest that while most textbooks incorporate gender‐just language, linguistic inclusivity often remains binary and tokenistic. The study concludes that while available teaching materials do significantly incorporate gender‐just language, holistic evaluation of gender‐just language in context is necessary to support pedagogies of care for transgender and gender non‐conforming students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tger.70030
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Gender‐Just Language in First‐Year German Textbooks

Lindsay Preseau
1 citations
Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German
Gender Studies in Language
3.87
article

A Comparative Analysis of Gender‐Just Language in First‐Year German Textbooks

Lindsay Preseau
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study analyzes the inclusion of binary and non‐binary gender‐just language in US first‐year college German textbooks. The analysis covers eight textbooks, evaluating their use of gender‐just forms such as the gender star and neopronouns, which explicitly represent non‐binary positionalities, as well as “neutral” or binary gender‐inclusive forms such as neutralization and the co‐naming of masculine and feminine forms. Findings indicate significant variation in inclusivity, with most textbooks integrating binary inclusivity, some textbooks integrating non‐binary inclusive language to some extent and only one predominantly using the generic masculine. Results suggest that while most textbooks incorporate gender‐just language, linguistic inclusivity often remains binary and tokenistic. The study concludes that while available teaching materials do significantly incorporate gender‐just language, holistic evaluation of gender‐just language in context is necessary to support pedagogies of care for transgender and gender non‐conforming students.

Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching GermanVol. 58(2)
Iowa State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gender Studies in Language
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.