Insight Into Puncture‐Induced Thermal Runaway in Lithium‐Ion Batteries to Reduce Fire Risks in Electric Vehicle Collisions

ABSTRACT Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) power electric vehicles through exceptional energy density but pose critical safety risks when mechanically compromised, particularly through nail penetration‐induced thermal runaway. This review synthesizes experimental and modeling studies to establish the thermal runaway initiation hierarchy: (1) State‐of‐charge (SOC) (doubles thermal runaway probability at over 60% SOC), (2) cathode chemistry (thermal runaway propagation of LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 ‐based batteries is eightfold faster than that of LiFePO 4 ‐based batteries), (3) nail properties (the possibility of short‐circuit current of steel‐based batteries is 40% higher than that of copper‐based batteries), and (4) penetration dynamics (depth's impact is more than that of separator thickness in triggering cascading failures). Thermal runaway mechanisms involve synergistic electrochemical–thermal–mechanical coupling, where localized heating (higher than 1 × 10⁴ K/s) initiates separator collapse (80°C–120°C) and electrolyte decomposition (200°C). Mitigation strategies focus on mechanically graded separators (SiO₂/polymer composites: increasing 180% in puncture resistance); shear‐thickening adhesives reducing impact forces by 35%–60%; halogen‐free electrolytes within a 2 s self‐extinguishing time; and solid‐state architectures showing 0% thermal runaway incidence in nail penetration tests. Critical gaps persist in standardizing penetration protocols (velocity: 0.1–80 mm/s variations across studies) and modeling micro‐short circuits. Emerging solutions prioritize materials‐by‐design approaches combining sacrificial microstructures with embedded thermal sensors. This analysis provides a roadmap for developing intrinsically safe LIBs that maintain energy density while achieving automotive‐grade mechanical robustness (ISO 6469‐1 compliance), ultimately advancing collision‐resilient electric vehicle battery systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Battery energy
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bte2.20250036
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insight Into Puncture‐Induced Thermal Runaway in Lithium‐Ion Batteries to Reduce Fire Risks in Electric Vehicle Collisions

Walid A. Daoud, Hong Zhao, Xiangkun Bo, Li Wang et al.
2 citations
Battery energy
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
1.37
article

Insight Into Puncture‐Induced Thermal Runaway in Lithium‐Ion Batteries to Reduce Fire Risks in Electric Vehicle Collisions

Walid A. Daoud, Hong Zhao, Xiangkun Bo, Li Wang, Zhiguo Zhang, Xiangming He
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) power electric vehicles through exceptional energy density but pose critical safety risks when mechanically compromised, particularly through nail penetration‐induced thermal runaway. This review synthesizes experimental and modeling studies to establish the thermal runaway initiation hierarchy: (1) State‐of‐charge (SOC) (doubles thermal runaway probability at over 60% SOC), (2) cathode chemistry (thermal runaway propagation of LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 ‐based batteries is eightfold faster than that of LiFePO 4 ‐based batteries), (3) nail properties (the possibility of short‐circuit current of steel‐based batteries is 40% higher than that of copper‐based batteries), and (4) penetration dynamics (depth's impact is more than that of separator thickness in triggering cascading failures). Thermal runaway mechanisms involve synergistic electrochemical–thermal–mechanical coupling, where localized heating (higher than 1 × 10⁴ K/s) initiates separator collapse (80°C–120°C) and electrolyte decomposition (200°C). Mitigation strategies focus on mechanically graded separators (SiO₂/polymer composites: increasing 180% in puncture resistance); shear‐thickening adhesives reducing impact forces by 35%–60%; halogen‐free electrolytes within a 2 s self‐extinguishing time; and solid‐state architectures showing 0% thermal runaway incidence in nail penetration tests. Critical gaps persist in standardizing penetration protocols (velocity: 0.1–80 mm/s variations across studies) and modeling micro‐short circuits. Emerging solutions prioritize materials‐by‐design approaches combining sacrificial microstructures with embedded thermal sensors. This analysis provides a roadmap for developing intrinsically safe LIBs that maintain energy density while achieving automotive‐grade mechanical robustness (ISO 6469‐1 compliance), ultimately advancing collision‐resilient electric vehicle battery systems.

Battery energyVol. 4(6)
Foshan University (CN), City University of Hong Kong (HK), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.