AI safety and regulatory capture

Abstract Researchers, politicians, and the general public support safety regulations on the production and use of AI technology. Yet regulations on new technology are susceptible to the harmful phenomenon of regulatory capture, in which organizations and institutions with economic or political power exert that power to use regulations to unjustly enrich themselves. Only a few authors have tried to raise the alarm about regulatory capture in AI safety and even fewer have described the problem and its implications in detail. Therefore, this paper has three related goals. The first goal is to argue for caution: AI safety is a field with enormous potential for such regulatory capture. Second, this paper explores, in detail, a variety of harms and injustices that captured AI-safety regulations are likely to create. The third goal, in the penultimate section, is to review and critique a few proposals that might mitigate the problem of regulatory capture of AI safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02534-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI safety and regulatory capture

Thomas Metcalf
1 citations
AI & Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

AI safety and regulatory capture

Thomas Metcalf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Researchers, politicians, and the general public support safety regulations on the production and use of AI technology. Yet regulations on new technology are susceptible to the harmful phenomenon of regulatory capture, in which organizations and institutions with economic or political power exert that power to use regulations to unjustly enrich themselves. Only a few authors have tried to raise the alarm about regulatory capture in AI safety and even fewer have described the problem and its implications in detail. Therefore, this paper has three related goals. The first goal is to argue for caution: AI safety is a field with enormous potential for such regulatory capture. Second, this paper explores, in detail, a variety of harms and injustices that captured AI-safety regulations are likely to create. The third goal, in the penultimate section, is to review and critique a few proposals that might mitigate the problem of regulatory capture of AI safety.

AI & Society
University of Bonn (DE), Spring Hill College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.