Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey

The rise of LLM-based agents has opened new frontiers in AI applications, yet evaluating these agents remains a complex and underdeveloped area.This survey provides an in-depth overview of the emerging field of LLM agent evaluation, introducing a twodimensional taxonomy that organizes existing work along (1) evaluation objectives-what to evaluate, such as agent behavior, capabilities, reliability, and safety-and (2) evaluation process-how to evaluate, including interaction modes, datasets and benchmarks, metric computation methods, and tooling.In addition to taxonomy, we highlight enterprise-specific challenges, such as role-based access to data, the need for reliability guarantees, dynamic and longhorizon interactions, and compliance, which are often overlooked in current research.We also identify the future research directions, including holistic, more realistic, and scalable evaluation.This work aims to bring clarity to the fragmented landscape of agent evaluation and provide a framework for systematic assessment, enabling researchers and practitioners to evaluate LLM agents for real-world deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3711896.3736570
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Digital Rights Management and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
22.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey

Yipeng Li, Mahmoud Mohammadi, Jane Lo, Wendy Yip
7 citations
Digital Rights Management and Security
22.72
article

Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey

Yipeng Li, Mahmoud Mohammadi, Jane Lo, Wendy Yip
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The rise of LLM-based agents has opened new frontiers in AI applications, yet evaluating these agents remains a complex and underdeveloped area.This survey provides an in-depth overview of the emerging field of LLM agent evaluation, introducing a twodimensional taxonomy that organizes existing work along (1) evaluation objectives-what to evaluate, such as agent behavior, capabilities, reliability, and safety-and (2) evaluation process-how to evaluate, including interaction modes, datasets and benchmarks, metric computation methods, and tooling.In addition to taxonomy, we highlight enterprise-specific challenges, such as role-based access to data, the need for reliability guarantees, dynamic and longhorizon interactions, and compliance, which are often overlooked in current research.We also identify the future research directions, including holistic, more realistic, and scalable evaluation.This work aims to bring clarity to the fragmented landscape of agent evaluation and provide a framework for systematic assessment, enabling researchers and practitioners to evaluate LLM agents for real-world deployment.

Bellevue College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Digital Rights Management and Security
22.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey — Yipeng Li, Mahmoud Mohammadi, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS