Verification of Incomplete Graph Unlearning through Adversarial Perturbations

Graph unlearning (GU) enables data owners to remove specific data from a trained Graph Neural Network (GNN). However, a dishonest model provider may cheat on the unlearning process. This paper focuses on a specific type of cheating behavior in GU, namely incomplete edge unlearning, where the model provider removes only a subset of the requested edges from the trained GNN. We introduce PANDA, the first probabilistic GU verification framework, to detect such cheating behaviors. PANDA identifies a set of nodes, called token nodes, in the graph, and injects a set of fake edges, referred to as challenge edges, into the model to manipulate the predictions of token nodes. A key property of the challenge edges is that removing only a subset of them from the poisoned model does not change the token nodes' prediction. Then by requesting the removal of the challenge edges and observing the change in the token nodes' predictions, the verifier can assess the likelihood that the model provider has engaged in incomplete unlearning. To develop PANDA, we design a novel algorithm to identify the token nodes and generate their associated challenge edges. We rigorously quantify the verification probabilities achieved by PANDA. Our extensive empirical studies demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of PANDA in detecting incomplete edge unlearning across a variety of GNN models and unlearning algorithms. Furthermore, we show that PANDA exhibits strong robustness against state-of-the-art detection methods for graph adversarial perturbations. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/kunwu522/unlearning-verification-gnn.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3711896.3737179
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Verification of Incomplete Graph Unlearning through Adversarial Perturbations

Hui Wang, Kun Wu
2 citations
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
4.96
article

Verification of Incomplete Graph Unlearning through Adversarial Perturbations

Hui Wang, Kun Wu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Graph unlearning (GU) enables data owners to remove specific data from a trained Graph Neural Network (GNN). However, a dishonest model provider may cheat on the unlearning process. This paper focuses on a specific type of cheating behavior in GU, namely incomplete edge unlearning, where the model provider removes only a subset of the requested edges from the trained GNN. We introduce PANDA, the first probabilistic GU verification framework, to detect such cheating behaviors. PANDA identifies a set of nodes, called token nodes, in the graph, and injects a set of fake edges, referred to as challenge edges, into the model to manipulate the predictions of token nodes. A key property of the challenge edges is that removing only a subset of them from the poisoned model does not change the token nodes' prediction. Then by requesting the removal of the challenge edges and observing the change in the token nodes' predictions, the verifier can assess the likelihood that the model provider has engaged in incomplete unlearning. To develop PANDA, we design a novel algorithm to identify the token nodes and generate their associated challenge edges. We rigorously quantify the verification probabilities achieved by PANDA. Our extensive empirical studies demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of PANDA in detecting incomplete edge unlearning across a variety of GNN models and unlearning algorithms. Furthermore, we show that PANDA exhibits strong robustness against state-of-the-art detection methods for graph adversarial perturbations. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/kunwu522/unlearning-verification-gnn.

Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.