Development and Validation of a Three‐Dimensional Framework for Assessing Mathematical Collaborative Problem‐Solving Ability

ABSTRACT Collaborative problem‐solving (CPS) has been one of the essential core skills for future students. However, we found that there are many studies on the evaluation of collaborative problem‐solving skills, but there is little studies on the subject areas based on which collaborative problem‐solving skills have been evaluated. The three‐dimensional evaluation model of “cognitive ability‐collaborative ability‐mathematical problem‐solving process” constructed in this paper identifies the sub‐dimensions of cognitive ability and collaborative ability and divides the sub‐dimensions into definitive levels according to the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) classification theory as well as Bloom's theory of affective classification, which results in the formation of a system of observable and measurable indicators. We developed an effective structural equation modeling (SEM) approach to explore the relationship among mathematical collaborative problem‐solving(MCPS) ability elements though the utilization of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The result showed that eighteen elements all serves as predictive factor for Mathematical Collaborative Problem‐Solving ability variables. Therefore, we use mathematical problem solving as a vehicle to construct a framework for assessing junior high school students’ collaborative problem solving ability in mathematics. This model provides a clear measure of MCPS skills and facilitates education and learning for both teachers and students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology in the Schools
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.70047
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of a Three‐Dimensional Framework for Assessing Mathematical Collaborative Problem‐Solving Ability

Kai Zhou, Feng Min
Psychology in the Schools
Educational Research and Pedagogy
article

Development and Validation of a Three‐Dimensional Framework for Assessing Mathematical Collaborative Problem‐Solving Ability

Kai Zhou, Feng Min
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Collaborative problem‐solving (CPS) has been one of the essential core skills for future students. However, we found that there are many studies on the evaluation of collaborative problem‐solving skills, but there is little studies on the subject areas based on which collaborative problem‐solving skills have been evaluated. The three‐dimensional evaluation model of “cognitive ability‐collaborative ability‐mathematical problem‐solving process” constructed in this paper identifies the sub‐dimensions of cognitive ability and collaborative ability and divides the sub‐dimensions into definitive levels according to the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) classification theory as well as Bloom's theory of affective classification, which results in the formation of a system of observable and measurable indicators. We developed an effective structural equation modeling (SEM) approach to explore the relationship among mathematical collaborative problem‐solving(MCPS) ability elements though the utilization of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The result showed that eighteen elements all serves as predictive factor for Mathematical Collaborative Problem‐Solving ability variables. Therefore, we use mathematical problem solving as a vehicle to construct a framework for assessing junior high school students’ collaborative problem solving ability in mathematics. This model provides a clear measure of MCPS skills and facilitates education and learning for both teachers and students.

Psychology in the SchoolsVol. 62(12)
Longdong University (CN), Nanjing Xiaozhuang University (CN), Northwest Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Educational Research and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.