From the Invisibility of the Familiar to the Construction of Religious Names in Russian and Chinese Cultures (the Perspective of Intercultural Communication)

The article examines a number of examples of how key terms were created in Russian and Chinese cultures, which were used to construct an understanding of religious phenomena, including religion, magic, atheism, superstition, etc. The analysis is conducted from the standpoint of modern religious studies (anthropological theories of J. Fraser, B. Malinovsky, etc.) and social philosophy (N. Luhmann’s concept of autopoietic systems). Religion is described as “overseeing the unknown”, which, on the one hand, always remains “invisible”, i.e. It is “invisible”, but, on the other hand, in all cultures it is also symbolically constructed in images and symbols of the “sacred” (individual and collective practices and representations), as proper and worthy forms of local worship of “the highest order of nature, which is called divine” (Cicero). Three levels of representation of religious phenomena by means of intercultural communication as languages of the first, second and third order (I1, I2 and I3) are considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociopolitical sciences
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2025-15-3-213-220
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From the Invisibility of the Familiar to the Construction of Religious Names in Russian and Chinese Cultures (the Perspective of Intercultural Communication)

Е. И. Аринин, Kun Liu
Sociopolitical sciences
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

From the Invisibility of the Familiar to the Construction of Religious Names in Russian and Chinese Cultures (the Perspective of Intercultural Communication)

Е. И. Аринин, Kun Liu
article en

Abstract

The article examines a number of examples of how key terms were created in Russian and Chinese cultures, which were used to construct an understanding of religious phenomena, including religion, magic, atheism, superstition, etc. The analysis is conducted from the standpoint of modern religious studies (anthropological theories of J. Fraser, B. Malinovsky, etc.) and social philosophy (N. Luhmann’s concept of autopoietic systems). Religion is described as “overseeing the unknown”, which, on the one hand, always remains “invisible”, i.e. It is “invisible”, but, on the other hand, in all cultures it is also symbolically constructed in images and symbols of the “sacred” (individual and collective practices and representations), as proper and worthy forms of local worship of “the highest order of nature, which is called divine” (Cicero). Three levels of representation of religious phenomena by means of intercultural communication as languages of the first, second and third order (I1, I2 and I3) are considered.

Sociopolitical sciencesVol. 15(3)
Vladimir State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.