Problem Issues of Collecting Personal Data in the Era of Global Digitalization

In the era of rapid development of information technologies, we are faced with a fundamental imbalance between the technical improvement of monitoring systems and the legal mechanisms for their regulation. The central problem of today’s digital landscape is the critical discrepancy between the technological potential of monitoring systems and the insufficient legal framework regulating their functioning. This gap is especially noticeable in the international legal field, where national legislations often fail to adapt to the global nature of technologies. The mass collection of users’ digital footprints gives rise to a whole range of ethical dilemmas that require careful consideration. Of particular concern is the balance between ensuring security and preserving the personal space of citizens. This article is an in-depth study of the key problematic aspects of the functioning of the personal data collection system in the context of global digitalization. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the contradictions between the increasing technical capabilities of these systems and insufficient legal regulation of their use. The paper examines the ethical dilemmas that arise during the large-scale collection of users’ digital footprints and proposes conceptual approaches to the formation of a balanced regulatory system. The study covers a wide range of potential risks – from privacy breaches to the formation of social rating systems. The work uses an interdisciplinary approach that combines a comparative legal analysis of regulations and systemic modeling of potential data leakage risks. Critical contradictions between business needs to maximize the collection of user information and the fundamental right of citizens to privacy are identified. It is established that existing regulatory mechanisms do not correspond to the pace of development of data collection and analysis technologies. The authors formulated the principles of ethical use of data, taking into account the balance between innovative development and the protection of the digital sovereignty of the individual. The study of the problem includes an analysis of a wide range of potential socio-legal risks – from privacy breaches and discriminatory practices of algorithmic sorting to the creation of total social rating systems capable of transforming the very foundations of the social contract. The lack of transparent control mechanisms can lead to the formation of new forms of digital segregation and inequality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociopolitical sciences
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2025-15-3-182-188
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problem Issues of Collecting Personal Data in the Era of Global Digitalization

Тетяна Бондаренко, Yulia I. Frolovskaya
Sociopolitical sciences
Digital Transformation in Law
article

Problem Issues of Collecting Personal Data in the Era of Global Digitalization

Тетяна Бондаренко, Yulia I. Frolovskaya
article en

Abstract

In the era of rapid development of information technologies, we are faced with a fundamental imbalance between the technical improvement of monitoring systems and the legal mechanisms for their regulation. The central problem of today’s digital landscape is the critical discrepancy between the technological potential of monitoring systems and the insufficient legal framework regulating their functioning. This gap is especially noticeable in the international legal field, where national legislations often fail to adapt to the global nature of technologies. The mass collection of users’ digital footprints gives rise to a whole range of ethical dilemmas that require careful consideration. Of particular concern is the balance between ensuring security and preserving the personal space of citizens. This article is an in-depth study of the key problematic aspects of the functioning of the personal data collection system in the context of global digitalization. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the contradictions between the increasing technical capabilities of these systems and insufficient legal regulation of their use. The paper examines the ethical dilemmas that arise during the large-scale collection of users’ digital footprints and proposes conceptual approaches to the formation of a balanced regulatory system. The study covers a wide range of potential risks – from privacy breaches to the formation of social rating systems. The work uses an interdisciplinary approach that combines a comparative legal analysis of regulations and systemic modeling of potential data leakage risks. Critical contradictions between business needs to maximize the collection of user information and the fundamental right of citizens to privacy are identified. It is established that existing regulatory mechanisms do not correspond to the pace of development of data collection and analysis technologies. The authors formulated the principles of ethical use of data, taking into account the balance between innovative development and the protection of the digital sovereignty of the individual. The study of the problem includes an analysis of a wide range of potential socio-legal risks – from privacy breaches and discriminatory practices of algorithmic sorting to the creation of total social rating systems capable of transforming the very foundations of the social contract. The lack of transparent control mechanisms can lead to the formation of new forms of digital segregation and inequality.

Sociopolitical sciencesVol. 15(3)
Financial University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.