The Historical Evolution of the Discourse on Mass Media in Political Science

Political science, which has a unique methodological and rich empirical apparatus, has been formed without exaggeration for centuries, centuries. The periodization of the development of political science covers several historical milestones at once: Antiquity, Renaissance, Enlightenment, and the modern period. At each stage, positive knowledge was accumulated, systematized, and acquired the outlines of an autonomous theoretical science, which now has applied significance. Such thinkers and scientists as Plato, Cicero, Aristotle, Socrates, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Nicolo Machiavelli, John Milton, John Mill, Thomas More, Herbert Spencer, Karl Marx, Karl Popper, etc. made an invaluable contribution to the formation and development of political science. The institutionalization of political science or political institutionalization itself is inextricably linked with the description and justification of the effectiveness and stability of political processes that take place in various political systems. Within the framework of structural and functional analysis, the key component of any political system is the mass media. Of course, in the usual sense, traditional media were formed and developed much later than the first thoughts about the state, its structure, the categories of freedom, justice, and separation of powers arose, but the conceptual and explanatory base that exists today was not formed immediately. Moreover, the theoretical, methodological, and empirical foundations of the study of mass media require a multi-paradigm approach. The purpose of this work is a theoretical and methodological interpretation of universal and general categories that correspond to the stated topic of this study, and are reflected at the theoretical and empirical levels of political science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociopolitical sciences
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2025-15-3-42-50
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Historical Evolution of the Discourse on Mass Media in Political Science

V. P. Miletsky, Yaroslav A. Emelin
Sociopolitical sciences
Social Media and Politics
article

The Historical Evolution of the Discourse on Mass Media in Political Science

V. P. Miletsky, Yaroslav A. Emelin
article en

Abstract

Political science, which has a unique methodological and rich empirical apparatus, has been formed without exaggeration for centuries, centuries. The periodization of the development of political science covers several historical milestones at once: Antiquity, Renaissance, Enlightenment, and the modern period. At each stage, positive knowledge was accumulated, systematized, and acquired the outlines of an autonomous theoretical science, which now has applied significance. Such thinkers and scientists as Plato, Cicero, Aristotle, Socrates, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Nicolo Machiavelli, John Milton, John Mill, Thomas More, Herbert Spencer, Karl Marx, Karl Popper, etc. made an invaluable contribution to the formation and development of political science. The institutionalization of political science or political institutionalization itself is inextricably linked with the description and justification of the effectiveness and stability of political processes that take place in various political systems. Within the framework of structural and functional analysis, the key component of any political system is the mass media. Of course, in the usual sense, traditional media were formed and developed much later than the first thoughts about the state, its structure, the categories of freedom, justice, and separation of powers arose, but the conceptual and explanatory base that exists today was not formed immediately. Moreover, the theoretical, methodological, and empirical foundations of the study of mass media require a multi-paradigm approach. The purpose of this work is a theoretical and methodological interpretation of universal and general categories that correspond to the stated topic of this study, and are reflected at the theoretical and empirical levels of political science.

Sociopolitical sciencesVol. 15(3)
St Petersburg University (RU), Saint Petersburg State Electrotechnical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.