A Phishing Detection System by Application of Multi-Classifiers Using E-Voting Method

Abstract-Phishing remains a major global threat, exploiting human weaknesses to access sensitive data. Existing detection methods often struggle with high false positives and fail to adapt to evolving phishing tactics. This study proposes a phishing detection system that combines Support Vector Machine (SVM), Feed Forward Neural Network (FFNN), and Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) using a weighted voting approach. A cleaned and normalized dataset of URLs was used, with dimensionality reduction via PCA. The models were evaluated using metrics like accuracy, sensitivity, and detection time in MATLAB (R2023a). Results show that SVM achieves the best performance, with the lowest false positive rate (1.79%), highest precision (97.98%), and accuracy (97.75%). FFNN offers balanced performance, while ELM is the fastest but less accurate. The weighted voting mechanism consistently identifies phishing as the dominant class, enhancing detection accuracy. Overall, combining the three models improves robustness, with SVM emerging as the most effective classifier.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51583/ijltemas.2025.140600083
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Phishing Detection System by Application of Multi-Classifiers Using E-Voting Method

Wasiu Oladimeji Ismaila, Olufemi Olayanju Awodoye, Emmanuel Ugochukwu Ndibuisi, Folasade Muibat Ismaila
International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science
Spam and Phishing Detection
article

A Phishing Detection System by Application of Multi-Classifiers Using E-Voting Method

Wasiu Oladimeji Ismaila, Olufemi Olayanju Awodoye, Emmanuel Ugochukwu Ndibuisi, Folasade Muibat Ismaila
article en

Abstract

Abstract-Phishing remains a major global threat, exploiting human weaknesses to access sensitive data. Existing detection methods often struggle with high false positives and fail to adapt to evolving phishing tactics. This study proposes a phishing detection system that combines Support Vector Machine (SVM), Feed Forward Neural Network (FFNN), and Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) using a weighted voting approach. A cleaned and normalized dataset of URLs was used, with dimensionality reduction via PCA. The models were evaluated using metrics like accuracy, sensitivity, and detection time in MATLAB (R2023a). Results show that SVM achieves the best performance, with the lowest false positive rate (1.79%), highest precision (97.98%), and accuracy (97.75%). FFNN offers balanced performance, while ELM is the fastest but less accurate. The weighted voting mechanism consistently identifies phishing as the dominant class, enhancing detection accuracy. Overall, combining the three models improves robustness, with SVM emerging as the most effective classifier.

International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied ScienceVol. 14(6)
Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (NG)
Tertiary Education Trust Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Spam and Phishing Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Phishing Detection System by Application of Multi-Classifiers Using E-Voting Method — Wasiu Oladimeji Ismaila, Olufemi Olayanju Awodoye, et al. · International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS