Comparison of observed and predicted reflection loss in the Beaufort Sea using a multilayer, rough, acousto-elastic reflection coefficient model

The Canada Basin Acoustic Propagation Experiment (CANAPE) conducted during 2016–2017 utilized a 150-km radius, seven-mooring acoustic tomography array to examine acoustic propagation in the new Arctic. Broadband acoustic transmissions with center frequencies of 172.5, 250–255, and 275 Hz revealed identifiable and trackable ray-like arrivals with grazing angles of 10–20 degrees that reflect off the ice 3–10 times. Worcester et al. (2024) [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 156, 4181–4192] showed that the maximum excess transmission loss per surface reflection, defined as the increase in transmission loss relative to open water conditions, varies from 2–6 dB and is strongly frequency and angle dependent. The loss scales roughly with ice thickness. We have developed a four-layer (water, skeletal ice, solid ice, and air), acousto-elastic reflection loss model that incorporates roughness using the Rayleigh formula. When combined with in-situ observations of ice thickness and roughness, as well as physical parameters for ice from literature, the model shows good agreement with the observations during the maximum ice thickness period in June. Comparisons will be made for the ice growth and melting phases, sensitivity to ice parameters will be investigated, and the results will be interpreted in terms of first year ice rheology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0037916
Primary Topic
Underwater Acoustics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of observed and predicted reflection loss in the Beaufort Sea using a multilayer, rough, acousto-elastic reflection coefficient model

Gil Averbuch, Peter F. Worcester, John A. Colosi, Matthew A. Dzieciuch et al.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Underwater Acoustics Research
article

Comparison of observed and predicted reflection loss in the Beaufort Sea using a multilayer, rough, acousto-elastic reflection coefficient model

Gil Averbuch, Peter F. Worcester, John A. Colosi, Matthew A. Dzieciuch, Jonathan Levay
article en

Abstract

The Canada Basin Acoustic Propagation Experiment (CANAPE) conducted during 2016–2017 utilized a 150-km radius, seven-mooring acoustic tomography array to examine acoustic propagation in the new Arctic. Broadband acoustic transmissions with center frequencies of 172.5, 250–255, and 275 Hz revealed identifiable and trackable ray-like arrivals with grazing angles of 10–20 degrees that reflect off the ice 3–10 times. Worcester et al. (2024) [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 156, 4181–4192] showed that the maximum excess transmission loss per surface reflection, defined as the increase in transmission loss relative to open water conditions, varies from 2–6 dB and is strongly frequency and angle dependent. The loss scales roughly with ice thickness. We have developed a four-layer (water, skeletal ice, solid ice, and air), acousto-elastic reflection loss model that incorporates roughness using the Rayleigh formula. When combined with in-situ observations of ice thickness and roughness, as well as physical parameters for ice from literature, the model shows good agreement with the observations during the maximum ice thickness period in June. Comparisons will be made for the ice growth and melting phases, sensitivity to ice parameters will be investigated, and the results will be interpreted in terms of first year ice rheology.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4_Supplement)
Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Underwater Acoustics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.