Using computational tools to collect naturalistic data: Phonetic alignment in political debates

Language science research, particularly in spoken language, has often faced challenges when it comes to collecting naturalistic production data. While in-lab production studies specifically focus on word- or sentence-level productions with extractions of certain phonetic features, sociolinguistic studies focus on understanding characteristics of a speaker and how they manifest in their production, and the interaction of these two domains led to many theoretical and empirical advancements in sociophonetic research. However, due to the laborious nature of procuring naturalistic data along with significant logistical and methodological barriers, these data are scarce. Here, we created a brand-new computational pipeline called the Acoustic Analysis Pipeline, which is a collection of various modules that can be used independently or combined to procure, process, and analyze naturalistic, multi-speaker acoustic-phonetic data automatically. Currently, the pipeline’s main components are the detection, transcription, and analysis of vowel pitch and vowel formants in multi-speaker conversations. We present some preliminary data of phonetic alignment from political debates in the USA (2016–2024).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0037462
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using computational tools to collect naturalistic data: Phonetic alignment in political debates

Osama Khalid, Ethan Kutlu, Emerson Peters, Sarmad Chandio
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Using computational tools to collect naturalistic data: Phonetic alignment in political debates

Osama Khalid, Ethan Kutlu, Emerson Peters, Sarmad Chandio
article en

Abstract

Language science research, particularly in spoken language, has often faced challenges when it comes to collecting naturalistic production data. While in-lab production studies specifically focus on word- or sentence-level productions with extractions of certain phonetic features, sociolinguistic studies focus on understanding characteristics of a speaker and how they manifest in their production, and the interaction of these two domains led to many theoretical and empirical advancements in sociophonetic research. However, due to the laborious nature of procuring naturalistic data along with significant logistical and methodological barriers, these data are scarce. Here, we created a brand-new computational pipeline called the Acoustic Analysis Pipeline, which is a collection of various modules that can be used independently or combined to procure, process, and analyze naturalistic, multi-speaker acoustic-phonetic data automatically. Currently, the pipeline’s main components are the detection, transcription, and analysis of vowel pitch and vowel formants in multi-speaker conversations. We present some preliminary data of phonetic alignment from political debates in the USA (2016–2024).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4_Supplement)
University of Iowa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using computational tools to collect naturalistic data: Phonetic alignment in political debates — Osama Khalid, Ethan Kutlu, et al. · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS