Evidence of compensative listening for speech segregation in hearing-impaired adults

Hearing-impaired (HI) individuals vary widely in their ability to segregate the speech of a conversation partner from others speaking at the same time. The role of hearing loss can be difficult to gauge because reduced sensitivity to relevant speech cues may be compensated for by changes in the relative reliance listeners place on those cues. Here, we provide an example. Thirteen NH and 15 HI adults (PTA thresholds >25 dBHL from 0.25–8.0 kHz) heard natural recordings over headphones of two talkers speaking sentences concurrently. Talker B (distracter) was present on each trial, the other talker (target) was equally likely to be A or C differing from B and each other in fundamental frequency (F0) and azimuthal location (θ). The listeners’ task was to identify the target as A or C. Relative cue reliance, R = cF0/(cF0 + cθ), was determined from regression coefficients, c, relating the listener's response to trial-by-trial perturbations simulating natural variation in F0 and θ. Relative cue sensitivity, S = d′F0/(d′F0 + d′θ), was determined from listener performance, d′, for F0 and θ cues presented individually. The results show a significantly greater range of S and a positive correlation of S with R for HI compared to NH listeners. [Work supported by NIH R01 DC001262-31.]

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0037591
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence of compensative listening for speech segregation in hearing-impaired adults

Robert A. Lutfi, G.Buckston Brown, Jungmee Lee, Lindsey Kummerer
1 links
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Evidence of compensative listening for speech segregation in hearing-impaired adults

Robert A. Lutfi, G.Buckston Brown, Jungmee Lee, Lindsey Kummerer
article en

Abstract

Hearing-impaired (HI) individuals vary widely in their ability to segregate the speech of a conversation partner from others speaking at the same time. The role of hearing loss can be difficult to gauge because reduced sensitivity to relevant speech cues may be compensated for by changes in the relative reliance listeners place on those cues. Here, we provide an example. Thirteen NH and 15 HI adults (PTA thresholds >25 dBHL from 0.25–8.0 kHz) heard natural recordings over headphones of two talkers speaking sentences concurrently. Talker B (distracter) was present on each trial, the other talker (target) was equally likely to be A or C differing from B and each other in fundamental frequency (F0) and azimuthal location (θ). The listeners’ task was to identify the target as A or C. Relative cue reliance, R = cF0/(cF0 + cθ), was determined from regression coefficients, c, relating the listener's response to trial-by-trial perturbations simulating natural variation in F0 and θ. Relative cue sensitivity, S = d′F0/(d′F0 + d′θ), was determined from listener performance, d′, for F0 and θ cues presented individually. The results show a significantly greater range of S and a positive correlation of S with R for HI compared to NH listeners. [Work supported by NIH R01 DC001262-31.]

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4_Supplement)
University of South Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.