Chop, grind, puree, liquefy—How to set the right dose on your new histotripsy blender

Exposure to cavitation during histotripsy incrementally mechanically fractionates targeted tissues and, given sufficient exposure, ultimately reduces them to liquefied acellular homogenates. While one-size-fits-all max exposure treatments can be utilized to ensure complete liquefaction in nearly all cases, recent evidence from animal tumor models suggests this is not ideal and indicates there may be dose-dependent anti-tumor immune responses. The “puree” setting (complete cellular necrosis, but with intact cell nuclei remaining) has generally been found to produce the strongest immune responses. Monitoring the level of damage generated during histotripsy, particularly quantitatively and in the sub-liquefied regime, has remained a challenge. While ultrasound (US) imaging-based methods have been demonstrated for detecting the presence of histotripsy ablations, and in select cases the binary identification of complete liquefaction, they generally only work for US-accessible and/or for in-plane targets. Here, we describe methods for measuring acoustic shockwaves emitted during cavitation nucleation and collapse using transmit-receive capable histotripsy transducers to assess the lifespans of generated cavitation (and localize it in 3-D), and quantitatively correlate lifespans with damage outcomes generated in ex vivo tissues, even in targets inaccessible to US imagers (e.g., through the skull). Preliminary results and challenges experienced in in vivo studies are also presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0037694
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chop, grind, puree, liquefy—How to set the right dose on your new histotripsy blender

Mahmoud Komaiha, Scott Haskell, Jonathan R. Sukovich, Timothy L. Hall et al.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Chop, grind, puree, liquefy—How to set the right dose on your new histotripsy blender

Mahmoud Komaiha, Scott Haskell, Jonathan R. Sukovich, Timothy L. Hall, Zhen Xu, Joseph P. Lynch
article en

Abstract

Exposure to cavitation during histotripsy incrementally mechanically fractionates targeted tissues and, given sufficient exposure, ultimately reduces them to liquefied acellular homogenates. While one-size-fits-all max exposure treatments can be utilized to ensure complete liquefaction in nearly all cases, recent evidence from animal tumor models suggests this is not ideal and indicates there may be dose-dependent anti-tumor immune responses. The “puree” setting (complete cellular necrosis, but with intact cell nuclei remaining) has generally been found to produce the strongest immune responses. Monitoring the level of damage generated during histotripsy, particularly quantitatively and in the sub-liquefied regime, has remained a challenge. While ultrasound (US) imaging-based methods have been demonstrated for detecting the presence of histotripsy ablations, and in select cases the binary identification of complete liquefaction, they generally only work for US-accessible and/or for in-plane targets. Here, we describe methods for measuring acoustic shockwaves emitted during cavitation nucleation and collapse using transmit-receive capable histotripsy transducers to assess the lifespans of generated cavitation (and localize it in 3-D), and quantitatively correlate lifespans with damage outcomes generated in ex vivo tissues, even in targets inaccessible to US imagers (e.g., through the skull). Preliminary results and challenges experienced in in vivo studies are also presented.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4_Supplement)
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.