Effects of low-pass filtering and visual cue availability on English consonant-in-noise recognition for late bilinguals and monolinguals

Late bilingual listeners are typically more susceptible to noise when listening to speech in their second language than monolinguals, particularly with auditory-only input. Limited research has examined how auditory-only and visual cue availability influences second-language speech-in-noise recognition. This project examines whether low-pass filtering of auditory cues results in greater performance decrements for late Spanish/English bilinguals compared to English monolinguals, given their differing susceptibility to background noise, and how visual cue availability moderates this effect. Additionally, we investigate the extent to which late bilinguals and monolinguals benefit from audiovisual cue availability at different points on the psychometric function during English consonant recognition in noise. To address these questions, we focus on the effect of face masks, which both low-pass filter speech and occlude visual cues, offering an ecologically valid approach to examine these effects. We assess English consonant recognition in open syllables, such as “key,” “she,” and “me,” in speech-shaped noise presented at four signal-to-noise ratios. Participants are tested under two acoustic filtering conditions (all-pass filter and low-pass filter) and two modality conditions (auditory-only and audiovisual). Findings and their implications will be discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0037777
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of low-pass filtering and visual cue availability on English consonant-in-noise recognition for late bilinguals and monolinguals

Lori J. Leibold, Kaylah Lalonde, Emily Buss, Tiana Cowan et al.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Effects of low-pass filtering and visual cue availability on English consonant-in-noise recognition for late bilinguals and monolinguals

Lori J. Leibold, Kaylah Lalonde, Emily Buss, Tiana Cowan, Susan E. Hall
article en

Abstract

Late bilingual listeners are typically more susceptible to noise when listening to speech in their second language than monolinguals, particularly with auditory-only input. Limited research has examined how auditory-only and visual cue availability influences second-language speech-in-noise recognition. This project examines whether low-pass filtering of auditory cues results in greater performance decrements for late Spanish/English bilinguals compared to English monolinguals, given their differing susceptibility to background noise, and how visual cue availability moderates this effect. Additionally, we investigate the extent to which late bilinguals and monolinguals benefit from audiovisual cue availability at different points on the psychometric function during English consonant recognition in noise. To address these questions, we focus on the effect of face masks, which both low-pass filter speech and occlude visual cues, offering an ecologically valid approach to examine these effects. We assess English consonant recognition in open syllables, such as “key,” “she,” and “me,” in speech-shaped noise presented at four signal-to-noise ratios. Participants are tested under two acoustic filtering conditions (all-pass filter and low-pass filter) and two modality conditions (auditory-only and audiovisual). Findings and their implications will be discussed.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4_Supplement)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Boys Town (US), Boys Town National Research Hospital (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.