Head movement in an auditory stream segregation task: Hearing names and digits in a simulated audio-visual environment

Following conversation in a complex environment requires a listener to maintain continuous attention and use other sensory input to maximize speech reception. In a multi-talker conversation, that means turning the head to match the talker-location and using visual cues (e.g., lip and facial expressions). To test the interactions between these processes, we devised an experiment with two competing speech streams. The first stream used materials adapted from a video-podcast with four talkers, each on separate screens, arrayed horizontally with 30° separation. The second stream was composed of monosyllabic words interspersed with digits (CNIT) [Ozmeral et al., Int. J. Audiol. 59(6), 434–442 (2020)]. Head movements were recorded during each 90-sec trial. Both streams were presented co-located, at equal SNR, from the same loudspeaker as the active talker in the video-podcast conversation. Before each trial, participants (N = 13, young normal-hearing) were cued to either a single-task (detect names or digits) or dual-task (detect names and digits). Significantly higher accuracy was observed detecting digits versus names in both the single- and dual-task conditions. Correlations between head-orientation and talker-location show that as participants’ head-orientation followed the talker-location, name-detection accuracy improved while digit-detection degraded. Together, these results demonstrate the complex interactions of head-movement and visual stimuli on segregation of competing auditory streams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0037310
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Head movement in an auditory stream segregation task: Hearing names and digits in a simulated audio-visual environment

Nathan C. Higgins, Erol J. Ozmeral, Kayla R. Ardizzone
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Head movement in an auditory stream segregation task: Hearing names and digits in a simulated audio-visual environment

Nathan C. Higgins, Erol J. Ozmeral, Kayla R. Ardizzone
article en

Abstract

Following conversation in a complex environment requires a listener to maintain continuous attention and use other sensory input to maximize speech reception. In a multi-talker conversation, that means turning the head to match the talker-location and using visual cues (e.g., lip and facial expressions). To test the interactions between these processes, we devised an experiment with two competing speech streams. The first stream used materials adapted from a video-podcast with four talkers, each on separate screens, arrayed horizontally with 30° separation. The second stream was composed of monosyllabic words interspersed with digits (CNIT) [Ozmeral et al., Int. J. Audiol. 59(6), 434–442 (2020)]. Head movements were recorded during each 90-sec trial. Both streams were presented co-located, at equal SNR, from the same loudspeaker as the active talker in the video-podcast conversation. Before each trial, participants (N = 13, young normal-hearing) were cued to either a single-task (detect names or digits) or dual-task (detect names and digits). Significantly higher accuracy was observed detecting digits versus names in both the single- and dual-task conditions. Correlations between head-orientation and talker-location show that as participants’ head-orientation followed the talker-location, name-detection accuracy improved while digit-detection degraded. Together, these results demonstrate the complex interactions of head-movement and visual stimuli on segregation of competing auditory streams.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4_Supplement)
University of South Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.