Changing cues? How L2 Korean learners navigate VOT and F0 in Korean stop categorization

English distinguishes stop consonants through a binary voicing contrast, with voiced stops having shorter Voice Onset Time (VOT) than their voiceless counterparts. In contrast, Korean distinguishes stops into three categories: lenis, aspirated, and fortis. In both languages, VOT and the fundamental frequency (F0) of the following vowel are critical cues to distinguish stop contrasts. Korean listeners primarily rely on F0 for Korean stops (particularly when distinguishing lenis from aspirated) whereas English listeners primarily rely on VOT for English stops (Schertz et al., 2015). This presents a challenge for English learners of Korean, who must adapt to using different phonetic cues for categorizing ambiguous stops. This study investigates which phonetic cues are most informative to distinguish Korean stops by measuring adult L1 Korean speakers’ and L2 Korean learners’ speech categorization patterns using a Visual Analog Scaling Task, an updated approach to understanding speech categorization (Apfelbaum et al., 2022). Participants’ exposure to Korean and English is measured through a Social Network Questionnaire (SNQ). Similar to prior findings (Kutlu et al., 2024), L2 listeners who have more exposure to Korean, as measured by their SNQ, are expected to show more gradient categorization in Korean.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0038075
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changing cues? How L2 Korean learners navigate VOT and F0 in Korean stop categorization

Do Hyung Kim, Seoyeon Kim, Hyoju Kim, Ethan Kutlu et al.
1 links
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

Changing cues? How L2 Korean learners navigate VOT and F0 in Korean stop categorization

Do Hyung Kim, Seoyeon Kim, Hyoju Kim, Ethan Kutlu, J. Paul Boudreau
article en

Abstract

English distinguishes stop consonants through a binary voicing contrast, with voiced stops having shorter Voice Onset Time (VOT) than their voiceless counterparts. In contrast, Korean distinguishes stops into three categories: lenis, aspirated, and fortis. In both languages, VOT and the fundamental frequency (F0) of the following vowel are critical cues to distinguish stop contrasts. Korean listeners primarily rely on F0 for Korean stops (particularly when distinguishing lenis from aspirated) whereas English listeners primarily rely on VOT for English stops (Schertz et al., 2015). This presents a challenge for English learners of Korean, who must adapt to using different phonetic cues for categorizing ambiguous stops. This study investigates which phonetic cues are most informative to distinguish Korean stops by measuring adult L1 Korean speakers’ and L2 Korean learners’ speech categorization patterns using a Visual Analog Scaling Task, an updated approach to understanding speech categorization (Apfelbaum et al., 2022). Participants’ exposure to Korean and English is measured through a Social Network Questionnaire (SNQ). Similar to prior findings (Kutlu et al., 2024), L2 listeners who have more exposure to Korean, as measured by their SNQ, are expected to show more gradient categorization in Korean.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4_Supplement)
University of Iowa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.