Inter-talker second-language (L2) phonetic similarity reflects L2 intelligibility and L1 background

Second-language (L2) speech deviates from L1 speech along multiple acoustic-phonetic dimensions. Free classification tasks have shown that L1 listeners judge similarities (or differences) between L2 speech based on, for instance, a talker’s gender, degree of foreign accent, or perceived L1 background. However, the acoustic-phonetic dimensions underlying these judgments remain poorly understood. We examined the perceptual organization of L2 speech using a self-supervised machine learning model trained on a large set of L1 speech. Sentence recordings of 63 L2 English talkers from 5 L1 backgrounds (11–14 talkers/L1, 118–120 sentences/talker) were transformed into multi-dimensional representations by this pre-trained model. Average inter-talker similarity within this multi-dimensional space was significantly related to L2 intelligibility and L1 background. Specifically, pairs of L2 English talkers with higher L2 intelligibility or shared L1 background were represented as more phonetically similar in the space than pairs of L2 talkers with lower intelligibility or different L1 backgrounds. Our investigation thus proposes a novel way of studying the cognitive representations of speech. The application of machine-learning techniques to the representation and classification of speech samples in a pre-trained, self-supervised, high-dimensional representation space opens the possibility of breakthroughs in our understanding of the multitude of acoustic-phonetic dimensions that underlie speech variation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0038077
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inter-talker second-language (L2) phonetic similarity reflects L2 intelligibility and L1 background

Ann R. Bradlow, Seung-Eun Kim, Matthew Goldrick
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Inter-talker second-language (L2) phonetic similarity reflects L2 intelligibility and L1 background

Ann R. Bradlow, Seung-Eun Kim, Matthew Goldrick
article en

Abstract

Second-language (L2) speech deviates from L1 speech along multiple acoustic-phonetic dimensions. Free classification tasks have shown that L1 listeners judge similarities (or differences) between L2 speech based on, for instance, a talker’s gender, degree of foreign accent, or perceived L1 background. However, the acoustic-phonetic dimensions underlying these judgments remain poorly understood. We examined the perceptual organization of L2 speech using a self-supervised machine learning model trained on a large set of L1 speech. Sentence recordings of 63 L2 English talkers from 5 L1 backgrounds (11–14 talkers/L1, 118–120 sentences/talker) were transformed into multi-dimensional representations by this pre-trained model. Average inter-talker similarity within this multi-dimensional space was significantly related to L2 intelligibility and L1 background. Specifically, pairs of L2 English talkers with higher L2 intelligibility or shared L1 background were represented as more phonetically similar in the space than pairs of L2 talkers with lower intelligibility or different L1 backgrounds. Our investigation thus proposes a novel way of studying the cognitive representations of speech. The application of machine-learning techniques to the representation and classification of speech samples in a pre-trained, self-supervised, high-dimensional representation space opens the possibility of breakthroughs in our understanding of the multitude of acoustic-phonetic dimensions that underlie speech variation.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4_Supplement)
Northwestern University (US), Northwestern University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.