Preventing Detention: Ethical and Legal Disputes Between Professionals in the Detention of Young People Who Present a Risk to Others

The detention of young people who pose a risk of harm to others can present major ethical and legal challenges to professionals. In this paper, we discuss those challenges with a particular focus on the causes of interprofessional disagreements that can seem intractable, and even lead to costly court proceedings. We use a clinically accurate composite case vignette to explore the commonest ethical dilemmas, which include (i) the costs of secure provision for young people and limits of resource provision (ii) the impact of professional anxiety about harmful outcomes, and (iii) the lack of attention to the voice of young people concerned. We discuss potential ways of improving ethical discussion between professionals in ways that are ethically coherent and respectful of different views.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Research Archives
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i7.6675
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preventing Detention: Ethical and Legal Disputes Between Professionals in the Detention of Young People Who Present a Risk to Others

Gwen Adshead, Annie Bartlett, Dr Heidi Hales, Dr Michael Jewell
Medical Research Archives
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Preventing Detention: Ethical and Legal Disputes Between Professionals in the Detention of Young People Who Present a Risk to Others

Gwen Adshead, Annie Bartlett, Dr Heidi Hales, Dr Michael Jewell
article en

Abstract

The detention of young people who pose a risk of harm to others can present major ethical and legal challenges to professionals. In this paper, we discuss those challenges with a particular focus on the causes of interprofessional disagreements that can seem intractable, and even lead to costly court proceedings. We use a clinically accurate composite case vignette to explore the commonest ethical dilemmas, which include (i) the costs of secure provision for young people and limits of resource provision (ii) the impact of professional anxiety about harmful outcomes, and (iii) the lack of attention to the voice of young people concerned. We discuss potential ways of improving ethical discussion between professionals in ways that are ethically coherent and respectful of different views.

Medical Research ArchivesVol. 13(7)
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (GB), Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (GB), South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preventing Detention: Ethical and Legal Disputes Between Professionals in the Detention of Young People Who Present a Risk to Others — Gwen Adshead, Annie Bartlett, et al. · Medical Research Archives (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS