Adherence to health‐related fitness tests in working‐aged adults—who are we (not) measuring?
The assessed HRF tests were feasible in terms of low exclusion rates. Individuals that were excluded or not participating the tests differed in their background characteristics from those who attended highlighting the importance of feasible testing methods to achieve a representative population sample of participants.
Authors
- Olli‐Pekka Nuuttila (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4819-0619)
- Pauliina Husu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1502-7428)
- Kari Tokola (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6466-4100)
- Tommi Juhani Vasankari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7209-9351)
- Henri Vähä‐Ypyä (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7537-2501)
- Harri Sievänen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3172-248X)
Institutions
- Tampere University (FI)
- Urho Kaleva Kekkonen Institute (FI)
- University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
- Published
- 2025-08-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.70020
- Primary Topic
- Physical Activity and Health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00