Why we should stress about stress scores: issues and directions for wearable stress-tracking technology

Abstract Stress-tracking technology is becoming widely available and accessible, offering non-invasive ways to monitor and regulate stress. Yet, current stress-tracking technology presents stress scores that lack transparency, informativeness, and nuance. This provocation paper discusses five key issues that the current stress-tracking technology should overcome, involving conceptualization, measurements, transparency, interpretation, and responsibility. Next, we provide three directions to overcome these issues and inform better stress-tracking practices and future research. Future stress technology should improve stress response measurements, use better terminology and data visualizations, and increase user involvement and transparency. We conclude that there is a pressing need for designers and researchers to take greater responsibility in creating stress-tracking technologies that are useful, fair and just, and centered around individuals’ needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interacting with Computers
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwaf036
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why we should stress about stress scores: issues and directions for wearable stress-tracking technology

Matthijs L. Noordzij, Armağan Karahanoğlu, Margaret H. Berg, Els Maeckelberghe et al.
Interacting with Computers
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Why we should stress about stress scores: issues and directions for wearable stress-tracking technology

Matthijs L. Noordzij, Armağan Karahanoğlu, Margaret H. Berg, Els Maeckelberghe, Geke Ludden
article en

Abstract

Abstract Stress-tracking technology is becoming widely available and accessible, offering non-invasive ways to monitor and regulate stress. Yet, current stress-tracking technology presents stress scores that lack transparency, informativeness, and nuance. This provocation paper discusses five key issues that the current stress-tracking technology should overcome, involving conceptualization, measurements, transparency, interpretation, and responsibility. Next, we provide three directions to overcome these issues and inform better stress-tracking practices and future research. Future stress technology should improve stress response measurements, use better terminology and data visualizations, and increase user involvement and transparency. We conclude that there is a pressing need for designers and researchers to take greater responsibility in creating stress-tracking technologies that are useful, fair and just, and centered around individuals’ needs.

Interacting with ComputersVol. 38(1)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Human Media (US), University of Twente (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why we should stress about stress scores: issues and directions for wearable stress-tracking technology — Matthijs L. Noordzij, Armağan Karahanoğlu, et al. · Interacting with Computers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS