Why we should stress about stress scores: issues and directions for wearable stress-tracking technology
Abstract Stress-tracking technology is becoming widely available and accessible, offering non-invasive ways to monitor and regulate stress. Yet, current stress-tracking technology presents stress scores that lack transparency, informativeness, and nuance. This provocation paper discusses five key issues that the current stress-tracking technology should overcome, involving conceptualization, measurements, transparency, interpretation, and responsibility. Next, we provide three directions to overcome these issues and inform better stress-tracking practices and future research. Future stress technology should improve stress response measurements, use better terminology and data visualizations, and increase user involvement and transparency. We conclude that there is a pressing need for designers and researchers to take greater responsibility in creating stress-tracking technologies that are useful, fair and just, and centered around individuals’ needs.
Authors
- Matthijs L. Noordzij (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5013-9225)
- Armağan Karahanoğlu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8801-9763)
- Margaret H. Berg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5517-1626)
- Els Maeckelberghe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3983-6089)
- Geke Ludden (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4508-9865)
Institutions
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Human Media (US)
- University of Twente (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Interacting with Computers
- Published
- 2025-06-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwaf036
- Primary Topic
- Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek