Effects of flow-responsive milking on milking performance of an automatic milking installation

The objective of this study was to compare a quarter-level vacuum-control system that maintains teat-end vacuum during milking to a similar system with conventional vacuum-control technology for which teat-end vacuum is reduced as milk flowrate increases. A study was performed on a pen of cows that had free access to one automatic milking system with conventional vacuum control and another automatic milking system with flow-responsive vacuum. The study ran for 111 d, during which time the pen contained between 120 and 128 cows that had free access to either milking station, producing a dataset with more than 32,000 milkings. The conventional control system maintained the receiver vacuum at 46 kPa, with a resulting vacuum drop at the teat end proportional to milk flowrate, while the flow-responsive treatment maintained a short-milk-tube vacuum at 45 kPa for the entire milking process. The milk removal rate was 12% greater for the flow-responsive system compared with the conventional vacuum system when measured over the milking station occupancy time and when measured by the milking time (first teat cup attached to last teat cup removed). The quarter-level milk removal rate was 16% higher for the flow-responsive treatment. The milk yield per milking compared with the expected milk yield, based on milk production rate and time since last milking, was 102 g higher at the udder level and 22 g higher at the quarter level in the flow-responsive system than in the conventional vacuum-control system, indicating more complete milking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JDS Communications
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2025-0819
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Freezing and Crystallization Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of flow-responsive milking on milking performance of an automatic milking installation

C.O. Paulrud, Douglas J. Reinemann, Johan Ter Weele
1 citations
JDS Communications
Freezing and Crystallization Processes
0.86
article

Effects of flow-responsive milking on milking performance of an automatic milking installation

C.O. Paulrud, Douglas J. Reinemann, Johan Ter Weele
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare a quarter-level vacuum-control system that maintains teat-end vacuum during milking to a similar system with conventional vacuum-control technology for which teat-end vacuum is reduced as milk flowrate increases. A study was performed on a pen of cows that had free access to one automatic milking system with conventional vacuum control and another automatic milking system with flow-responsive vacuum. The study ran for 111 d, during which time the pen contained between 120 and 128 cows that had free access to either milking station, producing a dataset with more than 32,000 milkings. The conventional control system maintained the receiver vacuum at 46 kPa, with a resulting vacuum drop at the teat end proportional to milk flowrate, while the flow-responsive treatment maintained a short-milk-tube vacuum at 45 kPa for the entire milking process. The milk removal rate was 12% greater for the flow-responsive system compared with the conventional vacuum system when measured over the milking station occupancy time and when measured by the milking time (first teat cup attached to last teat cup removed). The quarter-level milk removal rate was 16% higher for the flow-responsive treatment. The milk yield per milking compared with the expected milk yield, based on milk production rate and time since last milking, was 102 g higher at the udder level and 22 g higher at the quarter level in the flow-responsive system than in the conventional vacuum-control system, indicating more complete milking.

JDS CommunicationsVol. 6(6)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), DeLaval (Sweden) (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Freezing and Crystallization Processes
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.