Clinical outcomes and complications of tooth- and implant-supported lithium (di)silicate based single crowns: an overview of systematic reviews

Lithium (di)silicate ceramics provide an aesthetically and mechanically reliable option for single crowns in both anterior and posterior regions. Clinical evidence supports their excellent short- and medium-term survival with minimal antagonist wear, particularly when proper surface finishing protocols are followed. However, clinicians should be aware of material-specific differences among commercially available lithium (di)silicate systems and be cautious when extrapolating clinical results obtained from specific products to others. In light of limited long-term clinical data, practitioners should communicate both the well-documented short- to medium-term benefits and the remaining uncertainties regarding long-term performance. This overview also emphasizes the importance of critical appraisal of systematic reviews and encourages careful interpretation of pooled results, particularly in the presence of high heterogeneity or inappropriate data aggregation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dentistry
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106004
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes and complications of tooth- and implant-supported lithium (di)silicate based single crowns: an overview of systematic reviews

Martin Rosentritt, Konstantin J. Scholz, Helge Knüttel, Harald Laumbacher
4 citations
Journal of Dentistry
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
7.16
article

Clinical outcomes and complications of tooth- and implant-supported lithium (di)silicate based single crowns: an overview of systematic reviews

Martin Rosentritt, Konstantin J. Scholz, Helge Knüttel, Harald Laumbacher
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Lithium (di)silicate ceramics provide an aesthetically and mechanically reliable option for single crowns in both anterior and posterior regions. Clinical evidence supports their excellent short- and medium-term survival with minimal antagonist wear, particularly when proper surface finishing protocols are followed. However, clinicians should be aware of material-specific differences among commercially available lithium (di)silicate systems and be cautious when extrapolating clinical results obtained from specific products to others. In light of limited long-term clinical data, practitioners should communicate both the well-documented short- to medium-term benefits and the remaining uncertainties regarding long-term performance. This overview also emphasizes the importance of critical appraisal of systematic reviews and encourages careful interpretation of pooled results, particularly in the presence of high heterogeneity or inappropriate data aggregation.

Journal of DentistryVol. 162
University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), University Hospital Regensburg (DE), University of Regensburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
7.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinical outcomes and complications of tooth- and implant-supported lithium (di)silicate based single crowns: an overview of systematic reviews — Martin Rosentritt, Konstantin J. Scholz, et al. · Journal of Dentistry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS