Pedestrians’ social empathy and interaction with wheelchair users: The impact of user gestures and mobility aid design in a pilot study

Wheelchair users (WUs) experience various accessibility challenges in public spaces, which may lead them to seek assistance from pedestrians in difficult situations. In this context, understanding the factors influencing pedestrians' empathy and interaction with WUs facilitates their social interactions in challenging urban situations. This study examines how WUs’ body gestures and wheelchair design characteristics (WDCs) impact pedestrian perception and interaction. A pilot cross-sectional study was conducted with 52 participants in two phases: (1) a questionnaire assessing willingness to engage with WUs exhibiting independent or help-seeking gestures, and (2) evaluating four wheelchair types—from conventional to advanced—using key semantic descriptors of appearance and social perception. Findings revealed no significant relationship between age, gender, and willingness to interact across the two gesture conditions (p > 0.05), except for a significant association between age and willingness to interact with users of advanced powered wheelchairs in the help-seeking gesture condition (p = 0.027). Also, pedestrians' willingness to interact was significantly higher when WUs exhibited help-seeking gestures compared to independence gestures (p < 0.001). WDCs influenced pedestrian perceptions more strongly when WUs displayed independence (86.3 %) than help-seeking gestures (50 %). Moreover, analysis of semantic evaluations revealed distinct perceptual dimensions for advanced manual and powered wheelchairs, with three principal components identified for each, offering valuable insights for developing wheelchairs with greater social polish. This study highlights that both WDC and user gestures significantly affect pedestrian interaction, with the masking effect of help gestures on WDCs being a key finding. Additionally, advanced WDCs signify WUs' independence, helping reduce negative social stereotypes among pedestrians. • Help-seeking gestures prompt social interaction; independence gesture highlights the design impact on social perception. • As Age increases, pedestrians' willingness to show social empathy and interact with mobility aid users also increases. • Advanced and conventional wheelchair designs follow distinct semantic patterns; advanced ones stand out in social aspects. • Low social empathy ratings for the advanced wheelchairs may imply perceived independence or design-driven social distance. • PCA, capturing the first three components, shows distinct attitudes toward advanced manual and powered wheelchair designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103793
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pedestrians’ social empathy and interaction with wheelchair users: The impact of user gestures and mobility aid design in a pilot study

Mohsen Rasoulivalajoozi
2 citations
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
3.63
article

Pedestrians’ social empathy and interaction with wheelchair users: The impact of user gestures and mobility aid design in a pilot study

Mohsen Rasoulivalajoozi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Wheelchair users (WUs) experience various accessibility challenges in public spaces, which may lead them to seek assistance from pedestrians in difficult situations. In this context, understanding the factors influencing pedestrians' empathy and interaction with WUs facilitates their social interactions in challenging urban situations. This study examines how WUs’ body gestures and wheelchair design characteristics (WDCs) impact pedestrian perception and interaction. A pilot cross-sectional study was conducted with 52 participants in two phases: (1) a questionnaire assessing willingness to engage with WUs exhibiting independent or help-seeking gestures, and (2) evaluating four wheelchair types—from conventional to advanced—using key semantic descriptors of appearance and social perception. Findings revealed no significant relationship between age, gender, and willingness to interact across the two gesture conditions (p > 0.05), except for a significant association between age and willingness to interact with users of advanced powered wheelchairs in the help-seeking gesture condition (p = 0.027). Also, pedestrians' willingness to interact was significantly higher when WUs exhibited help-seeking gestures compared to independence gestures (p < 0.001). WDCs influenced pedestrian perceptions more strongly when WUs displayed independence (86.3 %) than help-seeking gestures (50 %). Moreover, analysis of semantic evaluations revealed distinct perceptual dimensions for advanced manual and powered wheelchairs, with three principal components identified for each, offering valuable insights for developing wheelchairs with greater social polish. This study highlights that both WDC and user gestures significantly affect pedestrian interaction, with the masking effect of help gestures on WDCs being a key finding. Additionally, advanced WDCs signify WUs' independence, helping reduce negative social stereotypes among pedestrians. • Help-seeking gestures prompt social interaction; independence gesture highlights the design impact on social perception. • As Age increases, pedestrians' willingness to show social empathy and interact with mobility aid users also increases. • Advanced and conventional wheelchair designs follow distinct semantic patterns; advanced ones stand out in social aspects. • Low social empathy ratings for the advanced wheelchairs may imply perceived independence or design-driven social distance. • PCA, capturing the first three components, shows distinct attitudes toward advanced manual and powered wheelchair designs.

International Journal of Industrial ErgonomicsVol. 109
Concordia University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
3.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.