Comparative evaluation of three different retreatment files for gutta-percha removal under confocal laser scanning microscope: An in vitro study

Aim of the study: To compare the efficacy of different rotary instruments for removing obturating material from root canals in premolars measured radiographically using confocal laser scanning microscope. Materials and Methodology: Twenty-four extracted human premolars (N=24) were selected for the study. Standard endodontic access cavities were prepared using an SF-41 bur, and working length was established with a size 10 K-file (Mani). Biomechanical preparation was completed using NeoEndo Flex rotary files up to size 25/.06. Canals were irrigated with 2 mL of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite followed by saline after each instrumentation. Master gutta-percha cones of size 25/.06 with accessory cones were used for Obturation along with AH Plus sealer. All samples were dried with paper points and obturated; radiographic verification was conducted to confirm apical extent and adaptation. The teeth were then stored at 37°C and 100% humidity for two weeks to allow complete sealer setting. Samples were divided into three groups (N=8 each): Group A-Retreatment Endodontics Kit, Group B-Endostar ReVision, and Group C-Coltene HyFlex Remover. Retreatment was performed using the respective systems, with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite irrigation after each instrument change. Retreatment was deemed complete when no visible gutta-percha or sealer remained on instruments or in the irrigant. Total retreatment time was recorded using a stopwatch, and residual filling materials were evaluated under a confocal laser scanning microscope. Results: In all the groups Coltene Hyflex Remover retreatment files showed less remnants of the gutta-percha. The time taken for retreatment was significantly higher for Retreaty from Perfect Endo followed by Endostar revision files and Coltene Hyflex Remover retreatment files. Conclusion: Coltene Hyflex Remover files had less time taken and least amount of remnants during retreatment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2025.v11.i2c.2149
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of three different retreatment files for gutta-percha removal under confocal laser scanning microscope: An in vitro study

Basavana Gowda, Ashwini Patil, L. Srimathi Priya, SV Satish et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
article

Comparative evaluation of three different retreatment files for gutta-percha removal under confocal laser scanning microscope: An in vitro study

Basavana Gowda, Ashwini Patil, L. Srimathi Priya, SV Satish, Suresh Kumar Kovvuru, Shriraksha S Sidnal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aim of the study: To compare the efficacy of different rotary instruments for removing obturating material from root canals in premolars measured radiographically using confocal laser scanning microscope. Materials and Methodology: Twenty-four extracted human premolars (N=24) were selected for the study. Standard endodontic access cavities were prepared using an SF-41 bur, and working length was established with a size 10 K-file (Mani). Biomechanical preparation was completed using NeoEndo Flex rotary files up to size 25/.06. Canals were irrigated with 2 mL of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite followed by saline after each instrumentation. Master gutta-percha cones of size 25/.06 with accessory cones were used for Obturation along with AH Plus sealer. All samples were dried with paper points and obturated; radiographic verification was conducted to confirm apical extent and adaptation. The teeth were then stored at 37°C and 100% humidity for two weeks to allow complete sealer setting. Samples were divided into three groups (N=8 each): Group A-Retreatment Endodontics Kit, Group B-Endostar ReVision, and Group C-Coltene HyFlex Remover. Retreatment was performed using the respective systems, with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite irrigation after each instrument change. Retreatment was deemed complete when no visible gutta-percha or sealer remained on instruments or in the irrigant. Total retreatment time was recorded using a stopwatch, and residual filling materials were evaluated under a confocal laser scanning microscope. Results: In all the groups Coltene Hyflex Remover retreatment files showed less remnants of the gutta-percha. The time taken for retreatment was significantly higher for Retreaty from Perfect Endo followed by Endostar revision files and Coltene Hyflex Remover retreatment files. Conclusion: Coltene Hyflex Remover files had less time taken and least amount of remnants during retreatment.

International Journal of Applied Dental SciencesVol. 11(2)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative evaluation of three different retreatment files for gutta-percha removal under confocal laser scanning microscope: An in vitro study — Basavana Gowda, Ashwini Patil, et al. · International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS