The Annual Carbon Footprint of In-Person Attendance at Major Neurological Conferences

Background: Anthropogenic climate change is the greatest threat to health of our century, including increased risk and severity of neurological diseases. Policies to contain the progression of climate change to within the adaptability of the human system demand urgent reduction in carbon emissions across all sectors. Neurologists should not be exempt. Global travel to conferences is the main source of academia’s carbon emissions. Lack of awareness of the extent of the problem and of the urgency of effective intervention may explain the lack of mitigating actions from the neurological community. We aimed to provide a conservative estimate of neurologists’ annual CO2 emissions from in-person attendance at some of their main global conferences. Methods: The number of in-person attendees at some major international neurological conferences in 2022/2023 was assessed by a Google search. The CO2 emissions per capita (tCO2/person) was calculated by obtaining the average of the values published in four studies of non-neurological conferences. The total tCO2 emissions from all attendees at the neurological conferences was then compared to the annual tCO2/person in various countries world-wide. Results: Thirteen conferences were identified with a total of 47,956 attendees. The total tCO2 emissions was then calculated at 93,994 (1.96 tonnes x 47,956 attendees). This equated to annual tCO2/person ranging from >2.0 million people in several African countries to 6.700 in Canada. Conclusion: This simple analysis based on literature values to calculate carbon emissions by attendees, shows staggering figures that only represent a partial annual contribution from the neurological discipline. In the context of a climate crisis that requires urgent actions, neurologists should carefully consider their choices and implement actions to effectively reduce the carbon cost of their conferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Research Archives
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i7.6714
Primary Topic
Conferences and Exhibitions Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Annual Carbon Footprint of In-Person Attendance at Major Neurological Conferences

Luciana Pelosi, Hannah Blumhardt
2 links
Medical Research Archives
Conferences and Exhibitions Management
article

The Annual Carbon Footprint of In-Person Attendance at Major Neurological Conferences

Luciana Pelosi, Hannah Blumhardt
article en

Abstract

Background: Anthropogenic climate change is the greatest threat to health of our century, including increased risk and severity of neurological diseases. Policies to contain the progression of climate change to within the adaptability of the human system demand urgent reduction in carbon emissions across all sectors. Neurologists should not be exempt. Global travel to conferences is the main source of academia’s carbon emissions. Lack of awareness of the extent of the problem and of the urgency of effective intervention may explain the lack of mitigating actions from the neurological community. We aimed to provide a conservative estimate of neurologists’ annual CO2 emissions from in-person attendance at some of their main global conferences. Methods: The number of in-person attendees at some major international neurological conferences in 2022/2023 was assessed by a Google search. The CO2 emissions per capita (tCO2/person) was calculated by obtaining the average of the values published in four studies of non-neurological conferences. The total tCO2 emissions from all attendees at the neurological conferences was then compared to the annual tCO2/person in various countries world-wide. Results: Thirteen conferences were identified with a total of 47,956 attendees. The total tCO2 emissions was then calculated at 93,994 (1.96 tonnes x 47,956 attendees). This equated to annual tCO2/person ranging from >2.0 million people in several African countries to 6.700 in Canada. Conclusion: This simple analysis based on literature values to calculate carbon emissions by attendees, shows staggering figures that only represent a partial annual contribution from the neurological discipline. In the context of a climate crisis that requires urgent actions, neurologists should carefully consider their choices and implement actions to effectively reduce the carbon cost of their conferences.

Medical Research ArchivesVol. 13(7)
University of Auckland (NZ), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Conferences and Exhibitions Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.