Sentiment Analysis and Stance Detection in Arab versus non-Arab English News Comments

This paper conducts sentiment analysis and stance detection on Arab and non-Arab Facebook comments associated with news articles likely to evoke anger, fear, sadness, and happiness emotions. The study found that both human and automated methods largely aligned in sentiment classification, assigning negative sentiment to comments on the articles evoking negative emotions and positive sentiment to discussions of the happiness-evoking article, yet they differed in the sentiment intensity values assigned to the comments associated with each emotion. Hyland’s (2005) stance model was also applied to explore stance or attitude towards the articles’ topics. The analysis revealed that both groups of commenters showed a predominant ‘against’ stance in discussions of topics evoking fear and sadness and a predominant ‘in favor of’ stance in the topic evoking happiness, but the two groups significantly differed in their stances towards the topic evoking anger, since it raised a controversial political issue. The paper recommends the use of the stance framework in future sentiment analysis for more accurate opinion mining results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CDELT Occasional Papers in the Development of English Education
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/opde.2025.445035
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sentiment Analysis and Stance Detection in Arab versus non-Arab English News Comments

Ingy Farouk Emara
CDELT Occasional Papers in the Development of English Education
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
article

Sentiment Analysis and Stance Detection in Arab versus non-Arab English News Comments

Ingy Farouk Emara
article en

Abstract

This paper conducts sentiment analysis and stance detection on Arab and non-Arab Facebook comments associated with news articles likely to evoke anger, fear, sadness, and happiness emotions. The study found that both human and automated methods largely aligned in sentiment classification, assigning negative sentiment to comments on the articles evoking negative emotions and positive sentiment to discussions of the happiness-evoking article, yet they differed in the sentiment intensity values assigned to the comments associated with each emotion. Hyland’s (2005) stance model was also applied to explore stance or attitude towards the articles’ topics. The analysis revealed that both groups of commenters showed a predominant ‘against’ stance in discussions of topics evoking fear and sadness and a predominant ‘in favor of’ stance in the topic evoking happiness, but the two groups significantly differed in their stances towards the topic evoking anger, since it raised a controversial political issue. The paper recommends the use of the stance framework in future sentiment analysis for more accurate opinion mining results.

CDELT Occasional Papers in the Development of English EducationVol. 90(1)
Center for Applied Linguistics (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.