Visual Outcomes of a New Hydrophobic Trifocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract Treatment: A Prospective Clinical Study

<b>Purpose:</b> To report the visual outcomes following bilateral implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) in patients with age-related cataracts. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective, noncomparative, multicenter study assessed 126 patients undergoing cataract extraction followed by AT ELANA 841P IOL implantation. At 4-6 months postoperatively, refractive error and predictability, monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), and binocular contrast sensitivity were measured. The binocular defocus curve was evaluated at 3 months postoperatively. <b>Results:</b> Postoperatively, most of the eyes (84.9%) were within ±0.5 D of spherical equivalent (SE) refraction and almost all eyes (98.9%) within ±1.0 D, with a mean SE value of -0.11 ± 0.37 D. Mean monocular CDVA was -0.06 ± 0.08 logMAR and UDVA was -0.01 ± 0.10 logMAR. Mean monocular uncorrected (UIVA and UNVA) and distance-corrected visual acuities (DCIVA and DCNVA) were 0.1 logMAR or better at intermediate (80 cm) and near (40 cm) distances. In the mean defocus curve, a continuous range of 0.1 logMAR or better vision from distance to near was observed. Percentages of eyes achieving CDVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA of 0.1 logMAR or better were 97.2%, 59.1% and 59.1%, respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR or better was achieved in 88.9% of the eyes at far, 57.1% at intermediate, and 44.4% at near distances. Contrast sensitivity was in the normal range of a phakic population at all spatial frequencies in all light conditions tested, photopic with glare and mesopic with and without glare. <b>Conclusion:</b> Implantation of the new AT ELANA 841P IOL following cataract extraction is safe and effective. Visual acuities at all distances, refractive outcomes, and contrast sensitivity were favorable at 4-6 months postoperatively, providing patients with satisfactory far, intermediate, and near vision. <b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06247683.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/2662730
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual Outcomes of a New Hydrophobic Trifocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract Treatment: A Prospective Clinical Study

Pavol Veselý, Marek Káčerik, Iveta Němcová, Lucia Hrčková et al.
1 citations
Journal of Ophthalmology
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
1.88
article

Visual Outcomes of a New Hydrophobic Trifocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract Treatment: A Prospective Clinical Study

Pavol Veselý, Marek Káčerik, Iveta Němcová, Lucia Hrčková, Peter Mojžíš, Andrea Janeková
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Purpose:</b> To report the visual outcomes following bilateral implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) in patients with age-related cataracts. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective, noncomparative, multicenter study assessed 126 patients undergoing cataract extraction followed by AT ELANA 841P IOL implantation. At 4-6 months postoperatively, refractive error and predictability, monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), and binocular contrast sensitivity were measured. The binocular defocus curve was evaluated at 3 months postoperatively. <b>Results:</b> Postoperatively, most of the eyes (84.9%) were within ±0.5 D of spherical equivalent (SE) refraction and almost all eyes (98.9%) within ±1.0 D, with a mean SE value of -0.11 ± 0.37 D. Mean monocular CDVA was -0.06 ± 0.08 logMAR and UDVA was -0.01 ± 0.10 logMAR. Mean monocular uncorrected (UIVA and UNVA) and distance-corrected visual acuities (DCIVA and DCNVA) were 0.1 logMAR or better at intermediate (80 cm) and near (40 cm) distances. In the mean defocus curve, a continuous range of 0.1 logMAR or better vision from distance to near was observed. Percentages of eyes achieving CDVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA of 0.1 logMAR or better were 97.2%, 59.1% and 59.1%, respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR or better was achieved in 88.9% of the eyes at far, 57.1% at intermediate, and 44.4% at near distances. Contrast sensitivity was in the normal range of a phakic population at all spatial frequencies in all light conditions tested, photopic with glare and mesopic with and without glare. <b>Conclusion:</b> Implantation of the new AT ELANA 841P IOL following cataract extraction is safe and effective. Visual acuities at all distances, refractive outcomes, and contrast sensitivity were favorable at 4-6 months postoperatively, providing patients with satisfactory far, intermediate, and near vision. <b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06247683.

Journal of OphthalmologyVol. 2025(1)
Charles University (CZ), Vysoká škola manažmentu, City University of Seattle (SK), Havlíčkův Brod Hospital (CZ), Eye Center (SA), Military University Hospital Prague (CZ), University of Hradec Králové (CZ)
Carl Zeiss Meditec AG
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.