Crowdfunding: An end of an era, or a course correction? A bibliometrics analysis.

Writing and publishing on crowdfunding has been booming since it began in 2010, till it showed its first decline in 2020. Bibliometric analyses of crowdfunding literature are very few, and the existing ones did not investigate the decline, nor did they try to understand the direction it was taking. Using bibliometric network analysis on Scopus data from 2010-2024, we investigate whether this decline represents a natural evolution of scholarly attention or signals a paradigm shift in the field. Through the lens of Kuhn's paradigm shift theory and citation lifecycle frameworks, we analyze co-authorship networks, citation patterns, and thematic evolution before and after 2020. Our findings reveal three distinct phases in crowdfunding research: emergence (2010-2015), consolidation (2016-2019), and transformation (2020-2024), with the latest phase characterized by greater fragmentation and a shift from financial mechanisms toward sustainability applications. This analysis provides critical insights for researchers, journal editors, and funding agencies navigating the evolving crowdfunding knowledge landscape. We also noted the underutilization of network science by researchers and have made some recommendations to remedy that in order to get better results in future analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economics Law and Society
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70009/jels.2025.2.1.5
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crowdfunding: An end of an era, or a course correction? A bibliometrics analysis.

Shadi Al Shebli
Journal of Economics Law and Society
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Crowdfunding: An end of an era, or a course correction? A bibliometrics analysis.

Shadi Al Shebli
article en

Abstract

Writing and publishing on crowdfunding has been booming since it began in 2010, till it showed its first decline in 2020. Bibliometric analyses of crowdfunding literature are very few, and the existing ones did not investigate the decline, nor did they try to understand the direction it was taking. Using bibliometric network analysis on Scopus data from 2010-2024, we investigate whether this decline represents a natural evolution of scholarly attention or signals a paradigm shift in the field. Through the lens of Kuhn's paradigm shift theory and citation lifecycle frameworks, we analyze co-authorship networks, citation patterns, and thematic evolution before and after 2020. Our findings reveal three distinct phases in crowdfunding research: emergence (2010-2015), consolidation (2016-2019), and transformation (2020-2024), with the latest phase characterized by greater fragmentation and a shift from financial mechanisms toward sustainability applications. This analysis provides critical insights for researchers, journal editors, and funding agencies navigating the evolving crowdfunding knowledge landscape. We also noted the underutilization of network science by researchers and have made some recommendations to remedy that in order to get better results in future analyses.

Journal of Economics Law and SocietyVol. 2(1)
Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.