Reframing Hahnemann’s Discovery of Homoeopathy within Modern Scientific Research Paradigms: A Historical-Epistemological Analysis

Background: Dr. Samuel Hahnemann (1755–1843) initiated the development of homoeopathy in response to the harmful and speculative medical practices of his time. Objective: To recontextualize Hahnemann’s methodological innovations within the framework of modern clinical research protocols and epistemological models. Methods: A historical-analytical approach was employed to reinterpret Hahnemann’s foundational work using a standard research protocol framework (problem identification, study design, data collection, ethics, analysis). Primary and secondary sources were critically examined. Results: Hahnemann’s process shows significant alignment with core principles of modern empirical research, including hypothesis formation, qualitative data collection, and ethical intent, despite the absence of control groups and statistical validation. Conclusion: Hahnemann’s methods, while historically constrained, offer a proto-scientific model of individualized, observational medicine and remain a significant case study in the evolution of medical methodology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54660/.ijmrge.2025.6.4.782-783
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reframing Hahnemann’s Discovery of Homoeopathy within Modern Scientific Research Paradigms: A Historical-Epistemological Analysis

Samit Dey, Syed Afsar Ali, Anindita Das, Abhishek Soni
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation
Mental Health and Psychiatry
article

Reframing Hahnemann’s Discovery of Homoeopathy within Modern Scientific Research Paradigms: A Historical-Epistemological Analysis

Samit Dey, Syed Afsar Ali, Anindita Das, Abhishek Soni
article en

Abstract

Background: Dr. Samuel Hahnemann (1755–1843) initiated the development of homoeopathy in response to the harmful and speculative medical practices of his time. Objective: To recontextualize Hahnemann’s methodological innovations within the framework of modern clinical research protocols and epistemological models. Methods: A historical-analytical approach was employed to reinterpret Hahnemann’s foundational work using a standard research protocol framework (problem identification, study design, data collection, ethics, analysis). Primary and secondary sources were critically examined. Results: Hahnemann’s process shows significant alignment with core principles of modern empirical research, including hypothesis formation, qualitative data collection, and ethical intent, despite the absence of control groups and statistical validation. Conclusion: Hahnemann’s methods, while historically constrained, offer a proto-scientific model of individualized, observational medicine and remain a significant case study in the evolution of medical methodology.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth EvaluationVol. 6(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Mental Health and Psychiatry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.