Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence as a Teaching Strategy Among University Professors: The Role of Habit, Hedonic Motivation, and Competence for Technology Integration

The immersion of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education presents significant challenges and opportunities. This study examines the acceptance of AI as a teaching strategy among university teachers, following the extended UTAUT2 model with the inclusion of the teacher skills and knowledge for technology integration (SKTI) construct. Employing a quantitative cross‐sectional research design, data were collected from 318 university teachers with prior experience using AI as a learning strategy through nonprobabilistic convenience sampling across 10 universities in northern Peru. Participants completed an online survey, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kruskal–Wallis tests with Dunn’s post hoc comparisons, and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM). The results showed that performance expectancy ( β = 0.129 ∗∗ ), hedonic motivation ( β = 0.167 ∗∗ ), habit ( β = 0.405 ∗∗∗ ), and SKTI ( β = 0.263 ∗∗∗ ) had a positive influence on the behavioral intention to adopt AI as a teaching strategy. Additionally, behavioral intention ( β = 0.303 ∗∗∗ ), facilitating conditions ( β = 0.115 ∗ ), and habit ( β = 0.464 ∗∗ ) determine the behavioral use of AI by teachers. The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed significant differences among age groups in the performance expectancy, social influence, habit, and behavioral intention constructs, with the 37‐ to 48‐year‐old age group showing higher average ranks. The discussion highlights that these findings suggest a positive adoption of AI among teachers, driven by individual and contextual factors, and challenges assumptions about the relevance of certain constructs in this specific context. In conclusion, this study represents a significant advancement in understanding the adoption of AI in university teaching and provides valuable guidance for practical implementation efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/hbe2/5933157
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence as a Teaching Strategy Among University Professors: The Role of Habit, Hedonic Motivation, and Competence for Technology Integration

Carmen Graciela Arbulú Pérez Várgas, Luigi Villena Zapata, Olger Huamaní Jordan, Benicio Gonzalo Acosta Enríquez et al.
2 citations
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
8.34
article

Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence as a Teaching Strategy Among University Professors: The Role of Habit, Hedonic Motivation, and Competence for Technology Integration

Carmen Graciela Arbulú Pérez Várgas, Luigi Villena Zapata, Olger Huamaní Jordan, Benicio Gonzalo Acosta Enríquez, Carlos López Roca, Betty Margarita Cabrera Cipirán, Willy Saavedra Villacrez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The immersion of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education presents significant challenges and opportunities. This study examines the acceptance of AI as a teaching strategy among university teachers, following the extended UTAUT2 model with the inclusion of the teacher skills and knowledge for technology integration (SKTI) construct. Employing a quantitative cross‐sectional research design, data were collected from 318 university teachers with prior experience using AI as a learning strategy through nonprobabilistic convenience sampling across 10 universities in northern Peru. Participants completed an online survey, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kruskal–Wallis tests with Dunn’s post hoc comparisons, and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM). The results showed that performance expectancy ( β = 0.129 ∗∗ ), hedonic motivation ( β = 0.167 ∗∗ ), habit ( β = 0.405 ∗∗∗ ), and SKTI ( β = 0.263 ∗∗∗ ) had a positive influence on the behavioral intention to adopt AI as a teaching strategy. Additionally, behavioral intention ( β = 0.303 ∗∗∗ ), facilitating conditions ( β = 0.115 ∗ ), and habit ( β = 0.464 ∗∗ ) determine the behavioral use of AI by teachers. The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed significant differences among age groups in the performance expectancy, social influence, habit, and behavioral intention constructs, with the 37‐ to 48‐year‐old age group showing higher average ranks. The discussion highlights that these findings suggest a positive adoption of AI among teachers, driven by individual and contextual factors, and challenges assumptions about the relevance of certain constructs in this specific context. In conclusion, this study represents a significant advancement in understanding the adoption of AI in university teaching and provides valuable guidance for practical implementation efforts.

Human Behavior and Emerging TechnologiesVol. 2025(1)
National University of San Marcos (PE), Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola (PE), Universidad César Vallejo (PE), National University of Trujillo (PE), Private University of Trujillo (PE), Universidad Tecnológica del Perú (PE), Private University of the North (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
8.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.