Domination and Balance of Degressively Proportional Allocations

According to the principle of degressively proportional allocation, if agents are ordered so that the sequence of their entitlements is increasing, then the quotients of goods apportioned to agents and entitlements of agents generate a nonincreasing sequence. In addition, an agent with a smaller entitlement cannot receive more goods than an agent with a greater entitlement and therefore degressive proportionality can be considered as a compromise between equality and proportionality. This compromise should guarantee that the interests of both low-entitlements and high-entitlements agents are protected. This paper considers the problem of domination of one group of agents over another in a degressively proportional allocation of goods. As a result, we conclude that there is no degressively proportional allocation rule such that its domination is finite with respect to both equal and proportional sequences of weight. However, it is possible to control both types of domination described.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251356332
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Domination and Balance of Degressively Proportional Allocations

Janusz Łyko, Arkadiusz Maciuk, Katarzyna Cegiełka, Piotr Dniestrzański et al.
SAGE Open
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

Domination and Balance of Degressively Proportional Allocations

Janusz Łyko, Arkadiusz Maciuk, Katarzyna Cegiełka, Piotr Dniestrzański, Maciej Szczeciński
article en

Abstract

According to the principle of degressively proportional allocation, if agents are ordered so that the sequence of their entitlements is increasing, then the quotients of goods apportioned to agents and entitlements of agents generate a nonincreasing sequence. In addition, an agent with a smaller entitlement cannot receive more goods than an agent with a greater entitlement and therefore degressive proportionality can be considered as a compromise between equality and proportionality. This compromise should guarantee that the interests of both low-entitlements and high-entitlements agents are protected. This paper considers the problem of domination of one group of agents over another in a degressively proportional allocation of goods. As a result, we conclude that there is no degressively proportional allocation rule such that its domination is finite with respect to both equal and proportional sequences of weight. However, it is possible to control both types of domination described.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(3)
Cyber University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Domination and Balance of Degressively Proportional Allocations — Janusz Łyko, Arkadiusz Maciuk, et al. · SAGE Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS