AI and DeFi Integration: Algorithmic Bias, Black-Box Opacity, and Regulatory Challenges

The integration of AI and DeFi drives financial innovation with applications like smart contract security and automated trading but raises critical challenges. This paper examines algorithmic bias, black-box opacity, and regulatory lags via peer-reviewed literature, industry/institutional reports, and cases (e.g., Apple Card, COMPAS). It analyzes how biased training data perpetuates discrimination in financial applications, while opaque AI models hinder bias detection and auditability, amplifying market volatility and systemic risks. EU, U.S., and Chinese regulatory frameworks face gaps in addressing technical complexity and cross-border fragmentation. Results show AI-DeFi integration exacerbates inequity and erodes trust and there is limited research focused on AI-DeFi specified risks and mitigating mechanism. Conclusions stress interdisciplinary governance, global regulatory coordination, and transparent AI architectures to mitigate risks, ensuring equitable/secure financial ecosystems to support regulatory management and sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Economics and Management Research
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56028/aemr.14.1.770.2025
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI and DeFi Integration: Algorithmic Bias, Black-Box Opacity, and Regulatory Challenges

Peiyi Zhou
Advances in Economics and Management Research
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
article

AI and DeFi Integration: Algorithmic Bias, Black-Box Opacity, and Regulatory Challenges

Peiyi Zhou
article en

Abstract

The integration of AI and DeFi drives financial innovation with applications like smart contract security and automated trading but raises critical challenges. This paper examines algorithmic bias, black-box opacity, and regulatory lags via peer-reviewed literature, industry/institutional reports, and cases (e.g., Apple Card, COMPAS). It analyzes how biased training data perpetuates discrimination in financial applications, while opaque AI models hinder bias detection and auditability, amplifying market volatility and systemic risks. EU, U.S., and Chinese regulatory frameworks face gaps in addressing technical complexity and cross-border fragmentation. Results show AI-DeFi integration exacerbates inequity and erodes trust and there is limited research focused on AI-DeFi specified risks and mitigating mechanism. Conclusions stress interdisciplinary governance, global regulatory coordination, and transparent AI architectures to mitigate risks, ensuring equitable/secure financial ecosystems to support regulatory management and sustainable development.

Advances in Economics and Management ResearchVol. 14(1)
University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.