Parametric investigation of a geotechnical survey: A case study of the central wing of a stadium foundation

Stadium foundations constructed in geologically sensitive areas require careful geotechnical evaluation to ensure structural safety and longevity. This study presents a sectional analysis of geotechnical results from building sites located near significant geological faults that may compromise structural integrity. This proposal stems from the excessive vibrations or collapses in some stadiums around the globe, often resulting from inadequate assessments of geological fault extensions and unexpected ground movements. To investigate this issue, three boreholes were drilled, and soil samples were collected at specific depths and tested. It was observed that some proposed stadium locations lie above active geological faults, necessitating the use of a hybrid footing design. A sectional analysis of the central wing of a proposed stadium was conducted to demonstrate that the foundation design is best understood when examined in discrete sections. Settlement predictions at the proposed site indicated significant activity between depths of 9 and 10 m. These results further corroborate the adoption of a hybrid footing system. Accordingly, this study proposes the implementation of a hybrid footing system incorporating circular, rectangular, and continuous footings, with estimated bearing capacities of 332.32 kN/sqm, 311.04 kN/sqm, and 586.01 kN/sqm, respectively. The findings underscore the critical role of sectional geotechnical analysis in foundation planning and highlight the effectiveness of hybrid footing systems in mitigating risks associated with underlying geological faults.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau025090021
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parametric investigation of a geotechnical survey: A case study of the central wing of a stadium foundation

Gbenga M. Alalade, M.E. Emetere, Fortune Aigbe
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Parametric investigation of a geotechnical survey: A case study of the central wing of a stadium foundation

Gbenga M. Alalade, M.E. Emetere, Fortune Aigbe
article en

Abstract

Stadium foundations constructed in geologically sensitive areas require careful geotechnical evaluation to ensure structural safety and longevity. This study presents a sectional analysis of geotechnical results from building sites located near significant geological faults that may compromise structural integrity. This proposal stems from the excessive vibrations or collapses in some stadiums around the globe, often resulting from inadequate assessments of geological fault extensions and unexpected ground movements. To investigate this issue, three boreholes were drilled, and soil samples were collected at specific depths and tested. It was observed that some proposed stadium locations lie above active geological faults, necessitating the use of a hybrid footing design. A sectional analysis of the central wing of a proposed stadium was conducted to demonstrate that the foundation design is best understood when examined in discrete sections. Settlement predictions at the proposed site indicated significant activity between depths of 9 and 10 m. These results further corroborate the adoption of a hybrid footing system. Accordingly, this study proposes the implementation of a hybrid footing system incorporating circular, rectangular, and continuous footings, with estimated bearing capacities of 332.32 kN/sqm, 311.04 kN/sqm, and 586.01 kN/sqm, respectively. The findings underscore the critical role of sectional geotechnical analysis in foundation planning and highlight the effectiveness of hybrid footing systems in mitigating risks associated with underlying geological faults.

Journal of Chinese Architecture and UrbanismVol. 0(0)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.