Machine Learning-Based Classification of Suspension Droplet-Solid Wall Impacts for Control of Droplet Fragmentation

This study explores the collision of suspension droplets against solid dry surfaces (substrates). It applies and compares multiple machine learning (ML) models for the classification of impact outcomes: splashing, breaking up, and rebound. A total of 372 experiments were performed with varied particle properties, liquid parameters, substrate properties, droplet velocity, and substrate inclination. The suggested markup indicators form the basis for computer vision processing of drop-wall impact videos. From 12 dimensionless features, 7 are selected to train ML classifiers. We tested 10 models, including Logistic Regression, KNN, SVM, ensemble methods (CatBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest, AdaBoost), and neural networks (MLP, TabNet). The gradient boosting model CatBoost showed the best results: accuracy and macro-averaged F1-score improved by more than 15% over the baseline, ROC-AUC exceeded 96%. Logistic Regression demonstrated robust generalization capabilities. The key physical finding is that greater sedimentation Stokes number, particle size, and inclination increase the likelihood of splashing and fragmentation. The models allow prediction of no-fragmentation outcomes, important for droplet-based 3D-printing and coating. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use ML for the classification of suspension drop-wall impacts, including data from experiments with both heavier and lighter-than-liquid particles and inclined surfaces. The results obtained assist in controlling suspension droplet impact to avoid fragmentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3594877
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Based Classification of Suspension Droplet-Solid Wall Impacts for Control of Droplet Fragmentation

Mikhail Vulf, Dmitry Kolomenskiy, Pavel Osinenko, Dmitry Eskin et al.
4 links
IEEE Access
Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
article

Machine Learning-Based Classification of Suspension Droplet-Solid Wall Impacts for Control of Droplet Fragmentation

Mikhail Vulf, Dmitry Kolomenskiy, Pavel Osinenko, Dmitry Eskin, Dmitry Zharikov
article en

Abstract

This study explores the collision of suspension droplets against solid dry surfaces (substrates). It applies and compares multiple machine learning (ML) models for the classification of impact outcomes: splashing, breaking up, and rebound. A total of 372 experiments were performed with varied particle properties, liquid parameters, substrate properties, droplet velocity, and substrate inclination. The suggested markup indicators form the basis for computer vision processing of drop-wall impact videos. From 12 dimensionless features, 7 are selected to train ML classifiers. We tested 10 models, including Logistic Regression, KNN, SVM, ensemble methods (CatBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest, AdaBoost), and neural networks (MLP, TabNet). The gradient boosting model CatBoost showed the best results: accuracy and macro-averaged F1-score improved by more than 15% over the baseline, ROC-AUC exceeded 96%. Logistic Regression demonstrated robust generalization capabilities. The key physical finding is that greater sedimentation Stokes number, particle size, and inclination increase the likelihood of splashing and fragmentation. The models allow prediction of no-fragmentation outcomes, important for droplet-based 3D-printing and coating. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use ML for the classification of suspension drop-wall impacts, including data from experiments with both heavier and lighter-than-liquid particles and inclined surfaces. The results obtained assist in controlling suspension droplet impact to avoid fragmentation.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU), Moscow Aviation Institute (RU)
Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.