Neonicotinoid and atrazine content in forage sources available to honey bees found near corn field margins collected around and after neonicotinoid-treated seed planting in southwestern Ontario, Canada

In 2013, flowering plant sources available to honey bees were surveyed around the perimeter of 18 corn fields located in southwestern Ontario. The forage resources identified were compared to the taxonomic composition of bee-collected pollen from hives placed near the corn fields during seven sampling periods from late April, around neonicotinoid-treated seed planting, until late June. During planting, honey bees collected pollen from mainly woody species with Acer spp., Salix spp., Populus spp., and Rosaceae predominating. Brassicaceae and Taraxacum spp. were the most frequently recovered herbaceous plant sources throughout May, albeit at low frequency. By mid-June, bees shifted to collecting pollen mainly from herbaceous flowers. Neonicotinoid and atrazine content were measured in all bee-collected pollen and two herbaceous ( T. officinale and Barbarea vulgaris) and two tree species ( Salix spp. and Crateagus spp.) that were used as indicator plants to assess the potential exposure of bees originating from this ecosystem at different timings from 2013 to 2015. Neonicotinoid residues in bee-collected pollen ranged from 1.6 to 62.1 ng/g, which were greater than observed in pollen-producing organs from indicator plants. During corn pollination, no tree pollen was found, and pollen from Trifolium, Lotus, and Parthenocissus spp. was preferred. Corn and soybean pollen was less favoured, collected only when other species were not available; corn pollen generally had concentrations less than 5 ng/g of total neonicotinoids. Neonicotinoid-contaminated pollen was collected from bee forage resources near agricultural fields, but exposure concentration was greater from other sources such as field and planter dust during foraging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Plant Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2025-0006
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neonicotinoid and atrazine content in forage sources available to honey bees found near corn field margins collected around and after neonicotinoid-treated seed planting in southwestern Ontario, Canada

Jocelyn L Smith, Victor Limay‐Rios, Tracey Baute, A. W. Schaafsma
Canadian Journal of Plant Science
Insect and Pesticide Research
article

Neonicotinoid and atrazine content in forage sources available to honey bees found near corn field margins collected around and after neonicotinoid-treated seed planting in southwestern Ontario, Canada

Jocelyn L Smith, Victor Limay‐Rios, Tracey Baute, A. W. Schaafsma
article en

Abstract

In 2013, flowering plant sources available to honey bees were surveyed around the perimeter of 18 corn fields located in southwestern Ontario. The forage resources identified were compared to the taxonomic composition of bee-collected pollen from hives placed near the corn fields during seven sampling periods from late April, around neonicotinoid-treated seed planting, until late June. During planting, honey bees collected pollen from mainly woody species with Acer spp., Salix spp., Populus spp., and Rosaceae predominating. Brassicaceae and Taraxacum spp. were the most frequently recovered herbaceous plant sources throughout May, albeit at low frequency. By mid-June, bees shifted to collecting pollen mainly from herbaceous flowers. Neonicotinoid and atrazine content were measured in all bee-collected pollen and two herbaceous ( T. officinale and Barbarea vulgaris) and two tree species ( Salix spp. and Crateagus spp.) that were used as indicator plants to assess the potential exposure of bees originating from this ecosystem at different timings from 2013 to 2015. Neonicotinoid residues in bee-collected pollen ranged from 1.6 to 62.1 ng/g, which were greater than observed in pollen-producing organs from indicator plants. During corn pollination, no tree pollen was found, and pollen from Trifolium, Lotus, and Parthenocissus spp. was preferred. Corn and soybean pollen was less favoured, collected only when other species were not available; corn pollen generally had concentrations less than 5 ng/g of total neonicotinoids. Neonicotinoid-contaminated pollen was collected from bee forage resources near agricultural fields, but exposure concentration was greater from other sources such as field and planter dust during foraging.

Canadian Journal of Plant ScienceVol. 105
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Insect and Pesticide Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.