El “trauma” subjetivo: gramática y discurso o la referencia escindida como efecto de la relación dialéctica enunciación/enunciado

The question about the speaking subject and meaning exhibits a kind of “trauma” that the language sciences cannot explain without questioning their own foundation to a certain extent. For this reason, the explanations constructed in this field usually ignore this widely corrosive “traumatic” element that would call into question the conception of language and discourse that they employ. In this paper, we will undertake a symptomatic reading (Althusser, 1983) of linguistics, particularly grammar, taking into account the “traumatic” (intractable) element that it expels from its core, inasmuch as its reception would dismantle it or, at least, make it falter as a disciplinary field of theoretical reflection and analytical exercise on language.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Semas
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61820/s.2683-3301.v6n12.163
Primary Topic
Cultural and political discourse analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

El “trauma” subjetivo: gramática y discurso o la referencia escindida como efecto de la relación dialéctica enunciación/enunciado

Silvia González
Semas
Cultural and political discourse analysis
article

El “trauma” subjetivo: gramática y discurso o la referencia escindida como efecto de la relación dialéctica enunciación/enunciado

Silvia González
article en

Abstract

The question about the speaking subject and meaning exhibits a kind of “trauma” that the language sciences cannot explain without questioning their own foundation to a certain extent. For this reason, the explanations constructed in this field usually ignore this widely corrosive “traumatic” element that would call into question the conception of language and discourse that they employ. In this paper, we will undertake a symptomatic reading (Althusser, 1983) of linguistics, particularly grammar, taking into account the “traumatic” (intractable) element that it expels from its core, inasmuch as its reception would dismantle it or, at least, make it falter as a disciplinary field of theoretical reflection and analytical exercise on language.

SemasVol. 6(12)
Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cultural and political discourse analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.