Defining impartiality in European public service media

Amid growing criticism and political scrutiny, defining and operationalising impartiality has ‎become essential for public service media (PSM). This research examines how impartiality is conceptualised‎ across policy, editorial guidelines, and regulatory oversight in three Western European markets through ‎a comparative analysis of documents from the BBC (United Kingdom), VRT (Flanders-Belgium), and RTÉ‎(Ireland). The article demonstrates that, first, while regulatory obligations enforce ‘impartiality’, clear‎ definitions in policy documents are lacking; second, editorial guidelines on impartiality show that it should ‎be perceived as a process rather than as a measurable, achievable state of journalistic performance.‎ Finally, the article shows the increased importance of complaint mechanisms and gatekeepers addressing‎ concerns about impartiality and its (audience) perception. Simultaneously, it demonstrates that existing ‎assessments fall short in researching its complexity, contributing to the perception that impartiality is an ‎achievable state of journalism that can be achieved in news reporting by journalists.‎

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medijske studije
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20901/ms.16.31.3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining impartiality in European public service media

Catalina Iordache, Tim Raats, Michael Pakvis
1 citations
Medijske studije
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
2.23
article

Defining impartiality in European public service media

Catalina Iordache, Tim Raats, Michael Pakvis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Amid growing criticism and political scrutiny, defining and operationalising impartiality has ‎become essential for public service media (PSM). This research examines how impartiality is conceptualised‎ across policy, editorial guidelines, and regulatory oversight in three Western European markets through ‎a comparative analysis of documents from the BBC (United Kingdom), VRT (Flanders-Belgium), and RTÉ‎(Ireland). The article demonstrates that, first, while regulatory obligations enforce ‘impartiality’, clear‎ definitions in policy documents are lacking; second, editorial guidelines on impartiality show that it should ‎be perceived as a process rather than as a measurable, achievable state of journalistic performance.‎ Finally, the article shows the increased importance of complaint mechanisms and gatekeepers addressing‎ concerns about impartiality and its (audience) perception. Simultaneously, it demonstrates that existing ‎assessments fall short in researching its complexity, contributing to the perception that impartiality is an ‎achievable state of journalism that can be achieved in news reporting by journalists.‎

Medijske studijeVol. 16(31)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.