Efficacy of Uterine Manipulator in Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Triple-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to investigate whether the advantages of uterine manipulators in laparoscopic hysterectomy could also be applied to abdominal hysterectomy. In the present study, we introduce a novel surgical technique that employs a uterine manipulator during open surgery and analyze the outcomes of this approach.MethodsA prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary research hospital with patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological indications between October 2023 and March 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to either conventional abdominal hysterectomy or manipulator-assisted abdominal hysterectomy. Primary outcomes included operative time, with secondary outcomes including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay.ResultsAmong the 142 participants, the manipulator group exhibited a mean operative time of 92.2 ± 11.1 minutes compared to 107.6 ± 14.4 minutes in the control group (<i>P</i> < .001). Length of hospital stay was also significantly shorter in the manipulator group (42.3 ± 14.7 hours vs 47.4 ± 15.8 hours; <i>P</i> = .046). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications or pain scores between groups. The mean postoperative hemoglobin decrease was significantly lower in the manipulator group (0.74 ± 0.28 g/dL) compared to the control group (1.52 ± 0.33 g/dL) (<i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionThe incorporation of a uterine manipulator in abdominal hysterectomy significantly reduces operative time, colpotomy time, and hospital stay while maintaining a comparable safety profile to conventional techniques. These findings suggest that uterine manipulators may enhance surgical efficiency and could be beneficial in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Innovation
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251360840
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Uterine Manipulator in Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Triple-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Esra Keleş, Gazi Yıldız, Murat Levent Dereli, Kaya Turan et al.
1 citations
Surgical Innovation
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
2.06
article

Efficacy of Uterine Manipulator in Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Triple-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Esra Keleş, Gazi Yıldız, Murat Levent Dereli, Kaya Turan, Emre Mat, Fatih Şanlıkan, Pınar Birol, Pınar Yıldız, Mehmet Mete Kirlangic, Batuhan Çağlar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to investigate whether the advantages of uterine manipulators in laparoscopic hysterectomy could also be applied to abdominal hysterectomy. In the present study, we introduce a novel surgical technique that employs a uterine manipulator during open surgery and analyze the outcomes of this approach.MethodsA prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary research hospital with patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological indications between October 2023 and March 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to either conventional abdominal hysterectomy or manipulator-assisted abdominal hysterectomy. Primary outcomes included operative time, with secondary outcomes including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay.ResultsAmong the 142 participants, the manipulator group exhibited a mean operative time of 92.2 ± 11.1 minutes compared to 107.6 ± 14.4 minutes in the control group (<i>P</i> < .001). Length of hospital stay was also significantly shorter in the manipulator group (42.3 ± 14.7 hours vs 47.4 ± 15.8 hours; <i>P</i> = .046). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications or pain scores between groups. The mean postoperative hemoglobin decrease was significantly lower in the manipulator group (0.74 ± 0.28 g/dL) compared to the control group (1.52 ± 0.33 g/dL) (<i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionThe incorporation of a uterine manipulator in abdominal hysterectomy significantly reduces operative time, colpotomy time, and hospital stay while maintaining a comparable safety profile to conventional techniques. These findings suggest that uterine manipulators may enhance surgical efficiency and could be beneficial in clinical practice.

Surgical InnovationVol. 32(6)
Dr Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Ümraniye Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Denizli Devlet Hastanesi (TR), Ophthalmology Clinic (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.