Circulatory Support for High-Risk Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Coronary Interventions: Where is the Evidence?

Coronary artery disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy or other high-risk features undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) present significant perioperative challenges due to elevated procedural risks. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices such as the intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella devices, and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have increasingly been used to mitigate these risks. This review aims to evaluate the evidence supporting the use of temporary MCS in high-risk CABG and PCI, define high-risk patient populations, and compare device-specific benefits, risks, and clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Angiology
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2655-2684
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circulatory Support for High-Risk Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Coronary Interventions: Where is the Evidence?

Andrew J. Gorton, Suresh Keshavamurthy
International Journal of Angiology
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Circulatory Support for High-Risk Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Coronary Interventions: Where is the Evidence?

Andrew J. Gorton, Suresh Keshavamurthy
article en

Abstract

Coronary artery disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy or other high-risk features undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) present significant perioperative challenges due to elevated procedural risks. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices such as the intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella devices, and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have increasingly been used to mitigate these risks. This review aims to evaluate the evidence supporting the use of temporary MCS in high-risk CABG and PCI, define high-risk patient populations, and compare device-specific benefits, risks, and clinical outcomes.

International Journal of AngiologyVol. 34(04)
University of Kentucky (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.