Australia's Regulations on Loot Boxes and Recommendations

This paper examines Australia's recent regulatory framework for loot boxes in video games, which came into effect on 22 September 2024. The new rules classify games containing loot boxes or other chance-based in-game purchases as Category M, restricting access to children under 15. The study explores the logic behind loot boxes, their psychological and financial impact on players, and compares Australia's approach to regulations in other jurisdictions such as Belgium, the UK, and China. The analysis highlights the addictive nature of loot boxes, their resemblance to gambling, and the potential risks they pose, particularly to minors. The paper concludes with recommendations for improving Australia's regulatory framework, including stricter categorization, real-name verification systems, and enhanced transparency in loot box mechanics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law Ethics and Social Sciences
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70088/9n99mb50
Primary Topic
Law, logistics, and international trade
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Australia's Regulations on Loot Boxes and Recommendations

Yikai Wang
1 links
International Journal of Law Ethics and Social Sciences
Law, logistics, and international trade
article

Australia's Regulations on Loot Boxes and Recommendations

Yikai Wang
article en

Abstract

This paper examines Australia's recent regulatory framework for loot boxes in video games, which came into effect on 22 September 2024. The new rules classify games containing loot boxes or other chance-based in-game purchases as Category M, restricting access to children under 15. The study explores the logic behind loot boxes, their psychological and financial impact on players, and compares Australia's approach to regulations in other jurisdictions such as Belgium, the UK, and China. The analysis highlights the addictive nature of loot boxes, their resemblance to gambling, and the potential risks they pose, particularly to minors. The paper concludes with recommendations for improving Australia's regulatory framework, including stricter categorization, real-name verification systems, and enhanced transparency in loot box mechanics.

International Journal of Law Ethics and Social SciencesVol. 2(1)
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Law, logistics, and international trade
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.